24/7 support on weekends and holidays

24/7 support on weekends and holidays

24/7 support on weekends and holidays

Allegations of sexual misconduct misconstrued as unavoidable touching in a small space in front of a restaurant

The client was leaving a restaurant and passed by the victim's back as she was standing in front of the restaurant, when suddenly the victim's group followed her, saying, "You put your nose in my hair and sniffed it and ran your hands all over my back." The client reported that she was groped. The client complained that the location was in front of a restaurant, where cars were parked in front of the restaurant and the area where the group of victims were standing was narrow, but that they never smelled the victim's hair, and that they may have bumped into each other as they passed by, but there was no intentional molestation such as looking at the entire back. At the police stage, the client responded alone without a lawyer, but when he was sent to the prosecution, he realized the seriousness of the case and came to Ongang Law Firm to plead with the prosecution to resolve his accusations. ■ Case Issues In a sex crime case, the victim's statement is given high credibility. Furthermore, the victim was not alone at the time, but her companion was also present at the scene,

A consensual relationship on the first date resulted in an accusation of rape months later.

The client met the complainant at a hobby club and kept in touch with her, and they had consensual sex on the date of the alleged incident, but months later she was accused of rape and indecent assault. The client appointed another lawyer, expecting that the case would be easily dismissed at the police stage due to favorable circumstances, such as the fact that the client continued to have sexual intercourse at the complainant's home even after the date of the alleged rape. However, the police sent the case to the prosecutor's office with a prosecution opinion for rape with intent to commit, a serious crime punishable by more than five years in prison. The client came to Onkang Law Firm with a desperate desire to resolve his injustice, thinking that the prosecutor would prosecute him as he was. ■ Case Issues The issues in this case were that the client and the complainant were close enough to have "consensual" sex at their first meeting, that the act of rape described by the complainant was an act that could not have occurred at the location of the incident, and that the meeting and

인도에서 발생한 신체접촉으로 강제추행으로 신고된 사례

의뢰인은 2022. 7월경 서울 마포구의 인도에서 피해자의 팔과 어깨, 몸통 부분을 만지는 등의 행위를 함으로써 피해자를 강제로 추행하였다는 혐의 사실로 경찰 조사 연락을 받고, 저희 법무법인 온강을 방문하셨습니다. 본건의 경우 의뢰인은 피해자와의 신체적 접촉 사실에 대해서는 모두 인정하고 있었으나, 이는 피해자와의 상호 합의하에 이루어진 것으로써 피해자의 의사에 반하여 한 것이 아니라는 취지로 혐의를 전면 부인하셨습니다. 또한 의뢰인의 신분이 경찰공무원이라 강제추행에 대해 혐의없음이나 기소유예 처분이 간절한 상황이었습니다.   ■ 사건 쟁점 의뢰인은 상담 초기 신체적 접촉이 상호 합의하에 이루어진 것임을 강조하시며 자신의 억울함을 표현하였으나, 이를 입증할 증거는 전혀 없는 상태였습니다. 검사 재직 시절 동종사건 처분 경험에 비추어 볼 때, 의뢰인의 주장을 입증할 증거가 없음에도 위 주장을 유지하는 경우 자칫 불리한 형을 선고받을

조카의 유서 작성과 고소로 시작된 성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(친족관계에의한강제추행)혐의

피의자는 2021. 9월경 서울 강남구 00 아파트 안방에서 피해자의 모습을 보고 순간적으로 욕정을 일으켜 피해자에게 가까이 다가가 피해자의 상체를 쓰다듬으며 피해자의 옷 안으로 손을 넣어 가슴을 만졌고 계속해서 왼손으로는 바지를 내려 성기를 꺼내 놓고 오른손은 피해자 츄리닝 바지에 넣어 강제로 음부에 검지, 중지 손가락을 넣었다 뺐다를 반복하는 등 그 의사에 반하여 피해자를 추행하였다.    ■ 사건 쟁점 의뢰인은 절대 조카인 고소인을 강제추행 하거나 유사강간 하지 않았다고 주장하였습니다. 사건 당일은 가족 모임을 하는 날이었고, 특히 사건 당시 안방에는 의뢰인의 장인 어른이 주무시고 계셨으며 거실에는 다른 가족들이 식사를 하며 간단히 술을 마시고 있던 상황이라 이를 고려하면 의뢰인의 주장이 일응 타당해 보였습니다. 다만 고소인이 의뢰인의 성기를 보았다고 하고 그 크기까지 구체적으로 진술하고 있는