의뢰인은 길을 걸어가는 도중 모르는 여성 2명이 다가 와 “왜 엉덩이를 만지고 지나가냐”라며 따지자, 그러한 사실이 없기에 무시하고 계속 길을 갔는데, 여성 2명이 계속 의뢰인의 앞길을 막고 폭행을 행사하여 도로로 끌려나갔습니다. 이후 여성들과 시비가 붙어 다툼을 벌이다 약속 장소로 갔는데, 해당 여성이 강제추행으로 고소하여 법무법인 온강을 찾아주셨습니다.   ■ 사건 쟁점 길을 지나가던 중 의뢰인이 여성과 부딪히는 장면을 목격하였다는 목격자의 목격진술이 있고, CCTV상에 의뢰인이 술에 많이 취한 듯한 모습이 있었으며, 고소인의 친구도 있었기에 무혐의 주장이 쉬운 사안은 아니었습니다. 이에 의뢰인 진술의 신빙성을 높이고, 고소인의 주장 중 경험칙에 반하거나 일관성이 없는 부분을 지적해야만 하였습니다.   ■ 쟁점 해결 법무법인 온강 변호인단은 의뢰인이 가족을 만나러 약속장소로 가던 길이었고, 해당 장면을 구체적으로 기억하는 등

The clients suffered for a long time because they were continuously groped and sexually harassed by the president of the company where they worked, but were unable to file a complaint due to the attitude of the president and his wife, who did not take it seriously, and their livelihood. Eventually, however, as the employees they worked with left the company one by one due to such harassment, and as their mental suffering became extremely severe as they were worried that they would be harassed again throughout their working lives, they decided to leave the company and filed a lawsuit against the defendants for violating the Special Act on the Punishment of Sexual Offenses (harassment due to work authority). ■ Case Issues The accused consistently denied the allegations throughout the investigation, stating that the physical contact was "a sign of friendliness," and even went so far as to sue for breach of privacy when the clients obtained CCTV for evidence of the groping, causing the clients to go through another distressing time before the case was dismissed. The accused's wife appeared as a witness during the trial and testified that the accused had made physical contact with her in a way that he normally treats his employees in a friendly manner.

The client was a casual passenger on the subway with the suspect and had never met him before. During the course of the subway ride, the client became involved in an argument with the suspect, during which the suspect inflicted a shoulder joint contusion on the client that required three weeks of medical treatment. The suspect also used his hands and cell phone to make multiple stabbing motions to the client's upper body, including his chest and abdomen. The client, who was studying to obtain a national board certification, was so upset and frustrated after the incident that she developed panic disorder and had breathing difficulties that prevented her from concentrating on her studies at the most critical time. The client had to go back and forth between orthopedic and psychiatric clinics, even though it was not enough to focus solely on preparing for the exam. He decided to sue us for rape and injury and came to us. ■ Case Issues The client and the accused did not have a relationship, and the case was filed against the accused.

의뢰인은 사건 발생 당일 지인을 통해 처음 고소인을 만나게 되었습니다. 의뢰인은 고소인 및 지인과 함께 오피스텔에서 술을 마시며 고소인과 조용히 자리를 옮겨 합의하에 스킨십을 하고 성관계까지 하게 되었는데, 이를 두고 고소인이 갑자기 강제추행 및 강간으로 고소한 사안입니다. 의뢰인은 경찰 조사시 변호사 없이 조사를 받았는데, 있는 그대로 사실대로만 말하면 경찰이 의뢰인 말을 믿어주리라 믿었지만, 오히려 고소인 편에서 압박하는 경찰의 태도를 보고 저희 법무법인 온강을 찾아오셨습니다.   ■ 사건 쟁점 저희 법무법인 온강에서는 의뢰인이 고소인과 함께 스킨십을 시작했을 때는 지인과 함께 한 술자리였다는 점, 이후 이어진 수위 높은 스킨십은 지인이 없는 장소에서 이루어졌다는 점에 착안하여 함께 술자리했던 지인의 진술이 중요하다는 점에 주목했습니다. 뿐만 아니라, 의뢰인과의 면담을 통해 사건 전후로 의뢰인이 고소인과 주고받은 문자메시지