When the client's girlfriend found out about the client and the complainant dating, the complainant claimed to have been raped by the client, but then changed her story to say that she could not remember, and did not press charges. Three years later, the complainant contacted the client out of the blue and demanded to speak to him, and when he did not respond, she accused him of rape, which led to this case. ■ Case Issues The client claimed that he and the complainant had consensual sex on good terms, but he was in a difficult situation due to a 'false' response on a polygraph test. In the end, the only evidence in the case was the complainant's statement, so the issue was whether the victim's statement was credible. ■ Resolving the issue The defense argued that the complainant did not specify a clear date of harm in her complaint, and in a subsequent statement, the complainant claimed that on the specific date of harm, she was with a friend.

의뢰인은 지인인 피해자1을 만나 술을 마신 후 피해자1이 술에 취하자 심신상실 상태인 피해자1을 간음하려다 미수에 그친 혐의(준강간미수) 및 위 사건을 담당하고 있는 경찰공무원인 피해자2에게 통신매체를 통하여 성적 수치심을 일으키는 글을 도달하게 한 혐의(통신매체이용음란)로 기소되어 저희 법무법인 온강을 찾아오셨습니다.   ■ 사건 쟁점 준강간미수 혐의 관련 이 사건 발생 장소인 모텔 CCTV 열람 및 소송기록 검토 결과 의뢰인의 혐의를 인정하고 선처를 구하는 것이 오히려 유리한 사안이었습니다.  또한 사건 담당 수사관에게 성적 수치심을 일으키는 글을 도달하게 한 혐의로 인해 의뢰인의 죄질이 더욱 불량하게 비춰질 수 있는 사안이었기 때문에 의뢰인의 일련의 행위들에 대한 적극적인 해명이 필요한 사건이었습니다.    ■ 쟁점 해결 피해자1의 변호사를 통해 여러 차례 합의를 시도하였으나, 피해자1의 완강한 거부 의사로 합의에 이를

The offender (appellant) was the client's pastor. The respondent was about 30 years older than the client, and over a period of five years, from when the client was a minor to when the client was an adult, the respondent engaged in dozens of unwanted sexual acts against the client, using force and sexual violence against the client. The client was so traumatized by the respondent's behavior that she attempted suicide on several occasions, and suffered physical harm that was difficult to recover from, resulting in extreme anxiety that prevented her from functioning in her daily life. The original prosecutor made a mechanical error of judgment by partially prosecuting and partially not prosecuting the same pattern of grooming sexual offenses over a number of years without clear criteria. The original prosecutor used the case hearing to clarify the nature of the hierarchy exercised by the respondent and the point at which it distorted the client's sexual decision-making, as well as the client's motivation for committing adultery.

The client consensually traveled to a motel to have sex with a woman he met through hunting, but when the woman's family was unable to reach the woman, they called 911 and used geolocation to raid the motel, where the client was charged with attempted rape. ■ Case Issues The client argued that although he had met the woman through hunting, they had a mutual attraction, exchanged phone numbers, talked, and consensually traveled to a motel, and that she was not intoxicated and incapacitated at the time. Ultimately, the issue in this case was whether the woman was incapacitated and whether the client intended to take advantage of this to commit adultery. ■ Resolving the issues The client's counsel quickly obtained motel surveillance footage, which confirmed that the woman had no problems walking, and showed the client and the woman actively making out before entering the motel. The client's counsel then argued that the woman was not incapacitated.