The client was accused of sexual harassment by a coworker who claimed that the client touched her body parts and attempted to kiss her on the day of the incident. ■ Case Issues The client had to prove that he did not forcibly grope the victim against her will, that she did not refuse to be touched, and that the touching was done in a mutually favorable state. Our lawyers secured the CCTV footage of the incident early through a motion to preserve evidence, and through careful analysis of the CCTV footage, we confirmed that the victim was in a harmonious mood when they were together and that there was no evidence of her being forcibly groped. We also confirmed that the victim usually initiated sexual conversations with our client and that she filed the complaint at a time when she claimed to have been treated unfairly by the company. We then helped her to state the facts in detail through an investigation exercise, and through the defense opinion, we showed that the CCTV footage in the

The client came to Ongang Law Firm in a state of panic after the accused took the drunken client to his home and then raped her while she was intoxicated and unable to resist, resulting in the client being diagnosed as needing two weeks of medical treatment. ■ Case Issues Given that the client could not properly recall the situation, the main issues in the case were whether the client was in a state of mind or incapacitated, whether the accused proceeded to rape the client against her will, knowing and tolerating the fact that she was in a state of mind, and whether the injuries she sustained constituted quasi-rape and manslaughter. ■ Resolution of the issues The defense team of Ong Kang Law Firm held a meeting to discuss the resolution of the case, and it was clear that the client was drunk and incapacitated on the day of the incident, that the rape was committed against the client's will, and that the accused committed the rape while recognizing and tolerating the fact that the client was incapacitated or incapacitated.

의뢰인은 길에 서 있는 피해자를 잡아 끌어당기는 등의 방법으로 피해자의 의사에 반하여 강제로 추행하였다는 사실로 경찰에 신고되었습니다.  ■ 사건 쟁점 의뢰인은 강제추행으로 집행유예를 선고받은 전력이 있어 이번 사건에 매우 불리한 상황에 있었으며, 사건 당시 피해자가 주장하는 사실과는 다른 부분이 존재하였는 바, 피해자의 주장 내용과 상반되는 의뢰인의 진술이 받아들여 지고, 피해자와 합의를 해야 하는 상황이었습니다. 이에 더해 양형자료를 준비하여 집행유예 전력이 있는 의뢰인에게 중형이 선고되지 않도록 방어해야 하는 상황이었습니다.   ■ 쟁점 해결 법무법인 온강 변호인단은 경찰조사 전 조사연습을 통해 피해자가 주장하는 피해사실 중 사실이 아닌 부분, 인정하는 부분을 분명히 하여 조사를 마쳤고, 피해자와 빠른 시간안에 합의를 하여 처벌불원서를 받았습니다. 또한, 온강 변호인단만의 양형자료를 철저하게 준비를 하였고, 변호인 의견서를 통해 의뢰인이 피해자와