24/7 support on weekends and holidays

24/7 support on weekends and holidays

24/7 support on weekends and holidays

오픈채팅 만남 후 촬영한 카메라등이용촬영 혐의

의뢰인께서는 오픈 채팅에서 알게 된 피해자와 숙박업소에서 성관계를 하는 모습을 촬영하여 카메라등이용촬영 혐의로 수사관님들께서 집으로 압수수색을 하러 와 두렵고 걱정스러운 마음에 법무법인 온강을 방문해주셨습니다.   ■ 사건 쟁점 혐의 사실들을 모두 인정하고, 피해자와 빠르게 합의한 뒤 기소유예 처분을 받아 신상정보등록 등 부수적인 행정 처분을 막아야 하는 상황이었습니다.   ■ 쟁점 해결 법무법인 온강 변호인단은, 혹여나 피해자가 불쾌함을 표현할 수 있는 상황이 우려되어 조심스레 피해자에게 연락을 시도한 후 의뢰인이 진심으로 반성하고 있는 점과 원만하게 합의를 희망한다는 의사를 전달하였으나 피해자가 처음에는 거부하였음에도 저희의 노력 끝에 ‘혐의에 대해 앞으로 그 어떠한 이의 제기도 하지 않겠다’는 합의서를 작성하였고, 기타 여러 양형자료를 준비를 할 수 있게 안내하여 합의서와 함께 제출하였습니다.    이러한 노력으로 의뢰인께서는 ‘교육조건부 기소유예’

Alleged sex trafficking for similar acts during massage

The client came to Ongang Law Firm because she was accused of engaging in prostitution by visiting a massage parlor, paying for a massage, and performing similar acts. ■ Case Issue The client had visited a massage parlor and received a massage, but the massage was too different from the type of massage she expected, but she was unable to protest and received the massage anyway, so she had to argue that it did not constitute prostitution because she did not visit the parlor to engage in similar behavior in the first place. The defense team of Ongang Law Firm confirmed that the client was a woman and the masseur was a man, and that they were both naked and unable to protest, and clarified the facts to avoid any other misunderstandings through investigation practice. In the defense opinion, the defense team argued that the client did not intend to engage in prostitution and did not have any suspicion that a similar act would be performed because she had seen positive reviews on the Internet, but rather that the masseur deceived the client and pretended to be a massage.

I received a threatening, stalking, and defamation of character lawsuit for complaining about illegal filming, but it was dismissed as self-defense.

The client was in the middle of a legal dispute with the accuser after being victimized by illegal filming, and in the process, he had a dispute with the accuser and protested by sending emails, but was sued for intimidation, stalking, and defamation. ■ Case Issues The client had sent several emails to the accuser to complain about the harm she had suffered, and had told the person concerned about the illegal filming, fearing that she would become another victim of sexually transmitted diseases. The client had to argue that he was angry at being victimized and sent complaints to the complainant, but that he did not commit the crime of stalking by making threats, and that he was not guilty of defamation as claimed by the complainant. ■ Resolving the issue Ong Kang's counsel obtained and reviewed in detail the complaint filed by the complainant and the emails sent by their client to the complainant. The counsel then

술 취한 상태라며 고소당한 준강간 혐의, 정황 반박과 대화·CCTV 증거로 불송치

의뢰인은 술에 취해 심신상실 또는 항거불능 상태에 있는 피해자의 옷을 벗긴 후 준강간하였다는 사실로 고소되어 법무법인 온강을 찾아주셨습니다.   ■ 사건 쟁점 의뢰인은 피해자가 술에 만취하여 심신상실 또는 항거불능 상태에 있지 않았으며, 다른 사람의 도움이나 부축 없이 스스로 걸어다녔고, 오히려 적극적으로 성관계에 임하였기에 모든 혐의사실을 부인하는 입장이었습니다.  피해자는 의뢰인을 바로 고소하지 않고 며칠간 의뢰인에게 호감을 표시하기도 하였으며 병원비를 명목으로 금전을 요구하기도 하였고, 의뢰인이 피해자에게 더 깊은 관계로 지내기 힘들다는 의사를 전달하자 태도가 돌변하여 고소에 이르게 된 사안으로 무혐의 주장을 해야만 하는 상황이었습니다.   ■ 쟁점 해결 법무법인 온강 변호인단은, 의뢰인이 피해자와 나눈 대화 내용을 모두 확보하여 분석하고, CCTV를 확보하여 피해자가 술에 만취한 상태가 아니었고 오히려 의뢰인에게 적극적으로 호감을 표현하고 먼저 안기도