The client had been acquainted with the complainant through mutual acquaintances, and they met at the complainant's request. They had sexual intercourse at the client's home, but the complainant accused the client of quasi-rape after the sexual intercourse. The client continued to insist that the sexual intercourse was mutually consensual and complained of injustice, and came to Ongang Law Firm to resolve the case. ■ Case Issues The key issues in this case were whether there was assault or intimidation at the time of the sexual intercourse, and whether the sexual intercourse was consensual. To support our client's claim, our lawyers closely examined the circumstances surrounding the incident and thoroughly reviewed the credibility of the complainant's statements and evidence. In particular, we collected various evidence, including the content of KakaoTalk conversations with the complainant, recordings, and her behavior after the incident, to prove that the sex was consensual.

■ Case Overview The client first met the victim through an application, and the two became intimate over drinks and conversation. On the day of the incident, the client and the victim traveled to a hostel together and had sex, but the case began when the victim accused the client of quasi-rape. The client claimed that the sex was mutually consensual, and the victim came to us for legal assistance. Case Issues The main issues were whether the victim was in a state of mind or incapacitation at the time, and whether the client intentionally committed the crime by taking advantage of the victim's condition. ■ Onkang's Assistance 1. Thorough Analysis of Facts and Securing EvidenceLaw Firm Onkang's defense team thoroughly analyzed all the facts related to the situation at the time of the incident. In particular, due to the client's habit of recording in his daily work, the recordings obtained proved that the victim was able to communicate at the time of the incident and that the sexual intercourse was consensual.

■ Case Overview Our client was accused of indecent assault based on a physical encounter that occurred during a social gathering with acquaintances. At the time of the incident, the client and the accuser were at the pool and had physical contact with each other, but it was a simple physical collision. However, the accuser took issue with the alleged sexual intent, and the client came to us to resolve the situation. Case Issues In the absence of objective evidence to prove the client's sexual intent other than the complainant's statement, CCTV footage of the incident and witness statements were key evidence in the case. Onkang's assistance 1. Thorough fact-finding and evidence gathering 2. Legal analysis and logical arguments 3. Legal responses to gender sensitivity 4. Aggressive defense at the prosecution stage ■ Outcome The prosecution found that the client's behavior had no sexual intent, and that the accuser's statement alone was not enough to prove the charge.