■ Case Overview The client approached the victim in connection with his business, explaining that he needed business funds and that he was profitable and had sufficient ability to repay. The client borrowed tens of millions of won from the victim, but was accused of not having sufficient ability to repay at the time. ■ Case Issues First, whether the fraud was intentional. The prosecution argued that the client had no intention or ability to repay from the beginning, while the defense emphasized that the delay in repayment was a temporary delay caused by the process of raising funds for business expansion. Second, the possibility of restitution and settlement. Given the client's criminal record, settlement with the victim was essential to avoid imprisonment. ■ Resolving the Issues Ongang's defense team developed the following defense strategy: First, we focused on aggressive settlement mediation with the victim. We maintained constant communication between our client and the victim to reach an amicable settlement.

■ Case Overview The client was introduced to the crime by members of a voice phishing organization at his home office, who explained the crime to him. The client engaged in voice phishing by calling victims in a foreign country and demanding money in exchange for videos of sex trafficking. The client extorted money from the victims, but felt remorseful during the crime and voluntarily stopped the crime, and after returning to Korea, he turned himself in. ■ Case Issues In this case, the client admitted to the crime and showed deep remorse and remorse, so our defense team's main goal was to minimize the sentence and obtain probation. In particular, the issue was whether the client, a first-time offender, would be sentenced to imprisonment or probation. Given the serious nature of the offense, it was important to determine how the court would assess the client's sincere remorse, willingness to improve, and efforts to repair the damage. The issues

Our client, who was working as an employee at a company run by our client, suddenly disappeared one day and accused our client of embezzlement by withdrawing cash from the company's account. ■ Case Issues The client's withdrawal of cash from the company's account on several occasions was clearly confirmed by the account transaction history, and the key issue was to prove that the client did not withdraw the cash for personal use. In response to the client's assertion that he withdrew cash to pay his business partners who demanded cash payments, but never to use it for personal purposes, our attorneys provided the client with transaction statements to support this claim and delivered a detailed denial of the embezzlement allegation to the police officer in charge, along with the attorneys' opinions.