24/7 support on weekends and holidays

24/7 support on weekends and holidays

24/7 support on weekends and holidays

강간죄 가해자의 무고죄 역고소로 인한 피소

의뢰인은 노래방 도우미로 일하던 중 술에 취하여 잠들어 있다 승합차에 타게 되었는데, 고소인과 함께 차를 타고 가던 중 고소인으로부터 승합차에서 강간을 당했습니다. 그런데 고소인이 이를 부인하며, 오히려 의뢰인을 무고로 고소한 사안입니다.   ■ 사건쟁점 의뢰인이 피해자라는 것을 증명하기 위해 사건 당시 의뢰인이 심신상실 상태에 있었는지, 강제로 성관계에 임한 것인지가 쟁점이었습니다.   ■ 쟁점해결 법무법인 온강 변호인단은 사건 당시 의뢰인이 심신상실 상태였던 점, 고소인과 나이차이가 많이 나고 친밀한 관계가 전혀 아니었던 점, 사람들이 통행하는 주차장에서 관계를 할 이유가 없는 점, 의뢰인은 범행 발생 약 2주 전에 임신중절을 한 상태였던 점, 의뢰인이 곧바로 남자친구에게 피해 사실을 알리고 신고하는 등 성범죄 피해자로서 할 수 있는 모든 조치를 성실히 한 점, 범행 이후 고소인과 연락하거나 일한

Violation of the Special Act on the Punishment of Crimes of Child Abuse by Child Care Workers (severe punishment for child abuse by child welfare facility workers)

The client, a childcare worker at a daycare center, was accused of physical abuse and neglect by the child's parents of violating the Special Act on the Punishment of Crimes of Child Abuse (severe punishment for child abuse by child welfare facility workers), alleging that she had physically abused and neglected the 2-year-old child in her care by slapping the child's hand once while stopping her from hitting another child. The case started with a misunderstanding between the parents of the victim child who suspected that the victim child had been injured frequently during his stay at the daycare center. The client claimed that the victim child's injuries were caused by a fall during a walk or a fight with another child, and that he had not intentionally inflicted physical or mental abuse on the victim child because he responded immediately. After reviewing whether there was intentional abuse by immediately securing CCTV data and checking the video, our defense team prepared a defense opinion stating that there was no intentional abuse, along with an explanation of the circumstances surrounding the incident.

Violation of the law on the punishment of stalking crimes, residential invasion, etc. due to multiple contacts to ex-lovers, etc.

The client broke up with her boyfriend and was told by him not to contact her. However, the client sent about 190 messages, made 79 phone calls, and went to her boyfriend's workplace and residence to settle debts from their relationship. The client was arrested for stalking and residential trespassing in front of her boyfriend's residence, and the case proceeded. ■ Case Issues The client received a provisional measure decision from the court while the investigation was underway for violation of the Stalking Penalties Act and residential invasion, but while hospitalized in the hospital due to paranoid mania, the client continued to try to contact the victim using a public phone. As a result, the client was charged with violating the provisional measure, and it was necessary to seek the best possible punishment through an amicable settlement with the victim. The defense team of Ongang Law Firm argued that the client was remorseful, that the client's behavior was not threatening or disturbing to the peace, that the client's deteriorating health condition led to the incident, and that the client was actively

경찰에 대한 항의 과정에서 공무집행방해

의뢰인은 만취한 상태로 길을 걸어가던 중, 어깨를 부딪히고 사과도 없이 지나간 성명불상의 남성에게 고함을 지르며 따라갔고, 이러한 장면이 당시 인근을 지나던 순찰차에 의해 목격되었습니다. 의뢰인은 억울하고 분한 마음에 해당 남성을 불러 세워 시비를 가리고 싶었으나, 경찰은 해당 남성을 그냥 돌려보냈습니다. 이에 의뢰인은 아무런 처사도 없이 가해 남성을 그냥 돌려보낸 것에 화가나 경찰에게 항의를 하던 중, 해당 경찰관을 밀치게 되었고 공무집행방해로 현행범으로 체포되었습니다. 의뢰인은 동종전과가 있었기에 바로 구공판처분되어 변호인의 적절한 도움 없이는 징역형이 선고될 수도 있던 사안이었습니다.   ■ 사건쟁점 의뢰인이 그동안 모범적으로 살아왔음을 강조하며, 아울러 재범 우려가 없음을 적극적으로 주장하여 최대한 징역형 선고만은 면해야 했습니다.   ■ 쟁점해결 법무법인 온강 변호인단은 이 사건 범행 당시 상황이 촬영된 장면을 분석하여 피해경찰관의 진술처럼 의뢰인이 해당