While walking in front of a club in an intoxicated state, the client was verbally abused and assaulted by two male club officials. He then assaulted two police officers, punching and kicking them because they did not believe him. The client, who was intoxicated, continued to lose his temper and protested to the officers, and was arrested on suspicion of obstruction of justice for assaulting two officers. The client had two prior convictions for violation of the Act on Aggravated Punishment of Certain Crimes (assault by a driver), property damage, and assault while intoxicated prior to this incident, making him a three-time violent offender, so defense counsel's assistance was essential as the punishment could be severe. The defense team analyzed the video footage of the incident and argued that the assault was minor and that the police officers did not suffer any injuries. The defense team also carefully examined the client's life history and argued that the client was a

The client was accused of assault and battery by wrapping his arms around the victim's neck, pushing the victim down, and causing the victim to suffer injuries such as a traumatic rupture that required approximately 28 days of medical treatment. ■ Case Issues 1) The client had a relevant criminal record and admitted to wrapping his arms around the victim's neck, but he was firm in his intention to never settle with the victim because he was firm in his belief that the victim was an insurance fraud. Therefore, it was necessary to admit the assault part without considering settling with the victim at all, but deny the other facts. 2) In this case, the victim first approached the defendant and started arguing with him (so-called victim-induced assault), and then presented objective evidence that the victim's behavior was not typical.

The client was in a relationship with the defendant from June 2022 to December 2022, but the defendant assaulted the client several times during the relationship, and finally assaulted and injured the client while they were traveling together on December 2022. The client notified the defendant of the breakup, but the defendant did not accept the breakup and continued to stalk the client by sending her calls and messages, and the messages were obscene enough to cause sexual humiliation. The client suffered for a long time, including undergoing psychiatric treatment, but the defendant never showed any remorse, so the client sued the defendant for assault, battery, violation of the stalking statute, and harassment. The client sued the defendant, and the defendant also sued the client for assault and other charges, so it was important for the client to get a favorable outcome in this case first. In addition, the defendant asked the client to settle the case, but if a settlement could not be reached, the client pleaded not guilty to the charges.

The client was accused of physically abusing the child, violating the Special Act on the Punishment of Crimes of Child Abuse, violating the Child Welfare Act, and violating the Child Abuse Act by slapping the child's head once around June 2023, serving moldy apple jam around July 2023, making potato pancakes with expired tempura flour, and serving red bean shaved ice with expired milk. ■ Case Issues The issues in this case were whether a single slap on the child's head constituted abuse, and whether the food ingredients used, such as mold, expired flour, and milk, were problematic as claimed by the complainant, and whether, even if they were, they constituted child abuse. The defense team of Ongang Law Firm tried to prove that the client's single touch of the child did not constitute an assault, but rather a just discipline. Therefore, they gathered case law related to the issue and submitted it to the investigator, showing that even in light of other case law, this case was a just discipline and not abuse.