After putting food on the stove, the client fell asleep for a while, but when he woke up, his house was on fire and he was rescued by firefighters, but after a while, he came to Ongang Law Firm complaining that he was being investigated by the police for 'arson of a prefectural building'. The client had a history of making frequent 112 calls, such as 'I am about to commit suicide', and had a history of attempted arson and obstruction of public administration, so the police strongly suspected that the fire was an attempt to commit suicide or self-harm, and to make matters worse, the fire forensic examination by the National Bureau of Investigation resulted in an appraisal opinion stating that it was 'difficult to believe it was a real fire'. Since the client was on probation at the time, he was expected to be sentenced to imprisonment if he was found guilty of arson of a residential building, which is only punishable by imprisonment, and the probation he had previously been sentenced to was also invalidated, resulting in a very embarrassing situation where he had to serve a double sentence. Ongang Law Firm's defense team was able to prove that the client's actions before falling asleep and the subsequent waking up and waiting for rescue were not the same.

The client was accused of child abuse by his biological daughter for many years. There were various circumstances, but he decided that it was difficult to solve the case on his own, so he contacted Ongang Law Firm. The client was accused of abusing his biological daughter, the complainant, for many years, and the method and timing of the crime were specific. However, the complainant suffered from mental illness and could not distinguish between reality and forgetfulness, and there were many witnesses, including her husband, during the period of time she claimed to have been abused, so it was necessary to prove that the client's accusation was false by synthesizing these circumstances. Our lawyers collected all of the complainant's medical and sentencing data from the client, and carefully prepared the contents of her statement to the investigating authorities through investigation practice. Afterwards, the lawyers testified together with the defense attorney, and in the defense opinion letter, they explained the complainant's mental history, submitted all of the medical data, and argued that the complainant's accusation of child abuse was due to delusion. The police authorized Law Firm Ongang

The client is a teacher at a daycare center, and has been abusive to the victim's mental health and development by slapping the victim's back with the palm of her hand because the victim was not eating well, then slapping the victim's back further when the victim was crying, and slapping the victim's face when the victim continued to cry, and the director of the daycare center and the victim's parents recognized these facts and reported the incident. ■ Case Issues There were parts of the CCTV that were exaggerated, and if the client did not intentionally hit the child in the CCTV footage, he had to explain the circumstances before and after the scene in question and state that it was not abuse, and quickly reach a settlement with the parents of the victim child to obtain a non-prosecution and prevent administrative penalties (employment restrictions for children's facilities). Ongang Law Firm's defense attorneys argued that the client was a first-time offender and that he had lost his temper while disciplining the child, which led to the crime.

The client arrived at his destination in a taxi after drinking alcohol, and after receiving a report that the customer was hitting him without paying, he slapped the police officer (Victim 1) on the head who responded to the scene, bit the upper part of Victim 2's right arm who was trying to restrain the client, and slashed the back of Victim 3's right hand to interfere with the police officers' legitimate duties in preventing, suppressing and investigating crimes. ■ Case Issues The client was in a situation where he had to prepare a defense based on the fact that he suffered from bipolar disorder and was undergoing treatment, and that he had no prior history of the same condition, and that he was drunk at the time of the incident, and that he had misunderstood and objected to the driver's statement that he had to pay for the fare, even though the fare was automatically paid when he used the app. ■ Issue Resolution Law Firm Ongang's defense team acknowledged that the client had done a great wrong, but was deeply remorseful and sincerely reflected on his mistake.