■ Case Overview Our client got into an argument with the facility manager at a hotel in downtown Seoul over parking, which resulted in a physical altercation that turned into a two-party assault case. In particular, the client's cell phone was assessed as a dangerous object, and special injury charges were added to the case. The client was charged with a serious charge of special injury even though the situation was close to self-defense, and sought professional legal assistance from Ongang Law Firm. ■ Case Issues The main issues in this case were: Whether the mobile phone was a 'dangerous object' Whether the act constituted special injury in light of the specific circumstances Determining the degree of mutual assault and the legitimacy of self-defense as a light defense to liability In particular, whether the mobile phone was a 'dangerous object' under the special injury law was a key issue. Onkang's defense in this case was based on three main strategies: First, the defense argued that the cell phone was a dangerous

■ Case Overview The client was accused of assault during a conversation with his father over the division of property. The case was a survival assault case involving sensitive property issues between the family members, so both the restoration of family relations and the legal response were important. The client was dismissed at the first instance, but the case went to trial due to the complainant's appeal, and he sought professional legal assistance. ■ Case Issues The key issues in this case were threefold: first, whether the motive for the assault could be established from the relationship between the client and the accuser; second, whether the assault was physically possible at the location where the incident occurred; and third, whether the accusation was credible and the accuser's motive for filing the complaint was genuine. It was important to clarify the facts of the case, especially as there were complex interests involved in the reconstruction condominium. ■ Ongang Law Firm

■ Case Overview The client was accused of reporting false facts in a complaint against an acquaintance. As the case was an innocent allegation of a sexual offense directly related to the victim's honor, severe punishment was expected. The client was sentenced to one year in prison in the original trial, and sought professional legal assistance in the appeal. ■ Case Issues The key issue in this case was whether the client could receive a reduced sentence by admitting to the crimes he had denied in the original trial and showing sincere remorse and restitution. In particular, it was important to effectively convince the client that he was not at risk of reoffending by reaching an agreement with the victim and demonstrating social ties. The defense team at Onkang Law Firm developed a comprehensive strategy for the appellate defense. First, we conducted in-depth counseling with the client, guiding him to write a sincere handwritten apology and reflection, and actively negotiated a settlement with the victim.