■ Case Overview The client was previously accused of sexual harassment by a coworker and paid a large settlement. Afterward, the client reported that he was subjected to unwanted physical contact by a coworker, but he was charged with falsely accusing the coworker of making a false report. The client came to Ongang Law Firm to find out the truth. ■ Case Issues The issue was whether the client's report was simply an exaggeration or whether it constituted innocence with the intent to report false facts and cause the other party to face criminal penalties. From the beginning of the case, our lawyers prepared thoroughly to prove the client's innocence. We emphasized that the client's report was not false, and collected and organized relevant evidence to prove the circumstances and consistency of the client's statements. In particular, we emphasized that the client had maintained consistent statements since the time of the incident, and emphasized that the client's

■ Case Overview The client recorded conversations to prove his partner's violence and intimidation during a domestic dispute. The client was charged with violating the Communications Secrecy Act because the recording inadvertently included a portion of a conversation with a third party. The client was a first-time offender and emphasized that the purpose of the recording was for his defense. Case Issues The key issues were whether the client's inclusion of a conversation with a third party in the recording process was intentional in violating the Communications Secrets Act and the legitimacy of the purpose of the recording. ■ Ong Kang's Assistance 1. Legal Basis and Lack of Intentionality The defense emphasized that the client's purpose of recording was to defend against violence and intimidation, and that the inclusion of a conversation with a third party was an unintended consequence. In particular, the fact that the beginning of the recording file consisted of a conversation between the client and the other party showed that the intentionality of the violation of the Communications Secrets Protection Act was not