The client was accused of the crime of stalking by the other party with whom he had a past relationship. The other party claimed that the client had caused him anxiety and fear by constantly contacting and approaching him, and sought punishment. The client argued that his behavior could not be considered stalking and that the other party's allegations were untrue. The client, who had suffered a great deal of emotional distress due to the sudden accusation, came to Wen Gang to clarify his situation and seek legal assistance. ■ Case Issues The key issues in this case were whether the client's behavior met the requirements of "stalking behavior" and "persistent or repetitive" under the Stalking Crimes and Punishment Act, and whether there was sufficient objective evidence to support the accusation other than the victim's claim. Onkang's defense team focused on the following efforts to alleviate the client's frustration and clear her name. 1. Careful legal review of the facts of the complaint

■ Case Summary The client went to the home of a romantic partner and was confronted with an unexpected situation. A third person present at the scene accused the client of special intimidation, alleging that the client had threatened him and damaged his property. The client, who felt wronged by the sudden accusation and needed legal assistance, came to WONKANG. ■ Case Issues The key issue in this case was whether the client's behavior met the elements of the crime of special intimidation, and in particular, to what extent the credibility of the victim's statement could be weighed against other evidence. Onkang Law Firm's defense team actively responded to the case from the outset to resolve the client's injustice. 1. Closely grasping and calling the facts At the time of the incident, the client was angry with the other party and did not have any ill will toward the victim.

■ Overview of the case The client was accused of being a victim of a sexual offense, but was instead accused of making a false report. The client was a minor at the time, and her relationship with the alleged perpetrator and the credibility of her account of how the incident occurred were in dispute. The client was deeply distressed by the sudden accusation of innocence, and was in need of legal assistance to clarify her accusations. ■ Case Issues The key issue in this case was whether the client's reported sexual offense victimization was false, contrary to the objective truth, and whether the client had made an affirmative showing of "falsity," which is a requirement for establishing innocence. ■ Onkang Law Firm's Assistance In order to alleviate the client's injustice, Onkang Law Firm's defense team immediately analyzed the case closely and focused on the following assistance. 1. Submission of defense briefs to actively argue the legal theory of innocence