Overview of the case (facts): In the course of a conflict with the other party, the client filed a false accusation, but the investigation by the investigative agency did not recognize the other party's accusation and a decision was made to dismiss the case. The client was subsequently prosecuted on an innocent charge and sentenced to one year in prison at the first trial. The client came to WONKANG at the appeals stage to correct his injustice and wrong judgment and to have his sentence reduced. Case Issues (Case Features): The main issue was that the client denied the charges in the first trial, but admitted the charges in the appeal, showed sincere remorse, and reached an amicable settlement with the victim. Onkang Law Firm's representation: Onkang Law Firm's defense team systematically developed an appellate strategy that emphasized the client's sincere remorse and efforts to repair the damage. 1. Submission of a sincere reflection: The client submitted a handwritten reflection to the appellate tribunal, showing that he deeply realized his wrongdoing and was remorseful. Good faith settlement with the victim: Through a prompt and sincere settlement with the victim

■ Overview of the Case (Facts) In a criminal case involving a celebrity, our client was accused of false imprisonment and defamation for his involvement in the criminal prosecution of the other party. Although the client only provided simple legal assistance to the complainant in a series of processes, including legal counseling, drafting a complaint, and reporting to the media, the other party alleged that the client intentionally disseminated falsehoods and induced the commission of a crime, resulting in severe criminal liability. The client came to WONKANG with a sense of injustice amidst the tangled statements of the parties involved, extensive conversations, recordings, and media reports. Case Issues (Features of the Case) The core issue was that the other party claimed that the client had intentionally induced innocent resolve and defamation, even though the client only provided simple legal counseling and fact-finding assistance. ■ Onkang's Assistance 1. Analyzing the Core Evidence and Legal Issues of the Case From the beginning of the investigation, Onkang's defense attorneys analyzed the case's vast amount of KakaoTalk, transcripts, medical records, and media articles.

Summary of the case: The client was charged with causing bodily injury during an argument with the victim. The first instance court found that the special injury part of the indictment was not proven, but accepted the general injury charge and sentenced the client to 4 months in prison and 1 year of probation. The client believed that the sentence imposed by the first instance court was too severe and contacted Ongang Law Firm. Case Issue: The main issue was sentencing injustice, arguing that the sentence was unreasonably heavy for the first trial verdict, where the client was sentenced to probation for general injury even though the charge of special injury was not admitted. Onkang's representation: Onkang represented the client on appeal and vigorously argued that the sentence imposed in the first trial was unjust. Specifically, we urged the trial court to grant our client maximum leniency, emphasizing the following points 1. the client's favorable sentencing conditions, as the client had no prior criminal history of the same offense, and had only received a heterogeneous fine in the past.

■ Overview of the case (facts) The client, who worked with children, was accused of emotionally abusive behavior in the course of counseling a child in her care. The child had been continuously exposed to severe abuse at home, which had resulted in an extremely unstable and upsetting psychological state. When the child was in a crisis situation and was experiencing serious difficulties, including extreme behavior, our client was accused of making some inappropriate remarks in the process of trying to calm the child down, and was put on trial. The key issues in the case were whether the client's counseling behavior during the crisis of a child who was suffering from extreme domestic abuse constituted emotional abuse under the law, and whether the client had the intent to abuse the child, especially in a situation where the child's family members downplayed their own abuse and only focused on the client's behavior.