■ Overview of the Case (Facts) Our client was charged with rape in connection with a physical encounter he had with a woman he met by chance near a guesthouse. The trial court found the client guilty and sentenced him to imprisonment based solely on the victim's statement. The client filed an appeal, complaining of unfairness, and sought our help to correct the unfairness of the trial court's decision. Case Issues (Case Features) In this case, the client was convicted in the first trial based solely on the victim's testimony, and the key issues on appeal were impeaching the credibility of the victim's testimony and disputing the realistic possibility of the crime method described in the indictment. On Kang's Assistance Law Firm's defense team actively contested the factual errors and legal errors of the first trial court's ruling on appeal, and focused on the following assistance to resolve the client's injustice. 1. Highlighting the inconsistency and vagueness of the victim's statements: The specifics of the victim's statements to the investigative agency and during the first trial were emphasized.

Overview of the Case (Facts) After breaking up with his former girlfriend, the client was experiencing emotional difficulties and accidentally photographed her private parts without her consent and posted them online. He also attempted to access her personal information. After receiving a suspended prison sentence and a long-term employment restriction order at the first trial, the client approached Ongang Law Firm to prepare for an appeal, fearing severe punishment and social stigmatization. ■ Case Issues (Case Features) This was an appellate case, and it was important to vigorously argue that the sentence handed down in the first trial (especially the five-year work restriction order) was excessive (sentencing injustice). In the appeal, we emphasized favorable mitigating factors, such as the client's admission of all charges, his sincere remorse, and his willingness to settle amicably with the victim to avoid punishment, to maintain the probation but exempt the client from the work restriction order, which was critical to his job and livelihood. On the Course

■ Overview of the Case (Facts) After drinking with acquaintances, the client visited an establishment he had known for many years. The client had been drinking heavily and made inappropriate physical contact with an establishment official while greeting the official, which led to a police investigation on suspicion of rape. The client was at risk of becoming a convicted sex offender due to a single mistake, so he came to Ongang Law Firm in desperation. ■ Case Issues (Case Features) Although the suspect admitted the facts of the crime, the key issue in this case was to collect and effectively argue for favorable mitigating evidence, such as extenuating circumstances, sincere remorse, and a settlement with the victim, in order to obtain a deferred prosecution. ■ Onkang's Assistance Onkang's defense team focused on the following assistance to help the client obtain a favorable plea and bring the case to an early conclusion: 1. Rapid response and strategy formulation at the beginning of the case:

After a night of drinking with acquaintances, the client visited an entertainment establishment, where he and a female hostess, who had been assigned as his partner, had drinks and conversation, and in a casual atmosphere, they engaged in consensual sexual intercourse for which they agreed to pay a certain amount of money. However, shortly after the sexual intercourse, the manager of the establishment suddenly entered the room and raised a problem, and shortly thereafter, the female hostess reported to the police that the client had raped her. Despite the consensual relationship, the client was accused of rape by Jolji, and he came to Ongang Law Firm with a dark cloud over his eyes. ■ Case Issues (Case Features) The key issue in this case was whether the sex was consensual, i.e., whether coercion, such as assault or threats, was used at the time of the sexual intercourse. The woman claimed that the client created a coercive atmosphere and made her unable to resist through assault and intimidation, including forcibly removing her clothes.