■ Overview of the Case (Facts) The client was investigated for illegally photographing the bodies of a large number of unspecified women in public places, including public transportation facilities. The crimes were committed on multiple occasions, which caused the victims to suffer considerable psychological trauma. Faced with the unexpected situation, the client was frightened and sought the help of legal experts to resolve the case. ■ Case Issues (Case Features) Despite the gravity of the crime, which was committed repeatedly over a considerable period of time against multiple victims, the key issue was to seek probation and exemption from security disposition as the client admitted his wrongdoing and made efforts to repair the damage and prevent recidivism. Our team communicated closely with the client from the outset of the case to ensure that the facts were accurate and that the client understood the seriousness of his situation. The client's sincere remorse for his wrongdoing and his commitment to rehabilitation and prevention of recidivism was evident.

■ Overview of the Case (Facts) The client was charged with sexual crimes against children and adolescents and was sentenced to imprisonment at the original trial and detained by the court. While the client deeply regretted his guilt, he decided to appeal the sentence, believing that it was too severe. Considering the pain of his family and the difficulties of his business, he sincerely sought our help. ■ Case Issues (Case Features) The main issues were whether the defendant, who denied the facts of the crime at the original trial, showed a changed attitude on appeal by admitting the crime and attempting to settle with the victim, and whether the original sentence was appropriate. Onkang's defense team conducted in-depth consultations with the client to closely understand the background of the case and the client's current situation. The team focused on actively convincing the trial court that the client, who had denied the crime at the original trial, sincerely regretted his wrongdoing at the appeal. Specifically, we worked to: first, demonstrate that our client admitted to the offense and was deeply remorseful and

■ Overview of the Case Our client, a nightclub owner, was charged with attempted adultery after he took a drunken and unconscious victim to a motel to commit adultery. After contesting the facts in the original trial, the client was convicted and sentenced to imprisonment, and he despaired of being able to support his family due to his sudden imprisonment. ■ Case Issues In this case, the main issue on appeal was whether the sentence of imprisonment imposed by the trial court was unreasonable, along with factual disputes over whether the victim was in a state of mind or incapacitated, and whether the prostitution was consensual. Through careful analysis of the case record and in-depth consultation with the client, our team determined that it was in the client's best interest to change the defense strategy to admit the facts of the crime, show sincere remorse, and argue for the unfairness of the sentence on appeal rather than disputing the facts in the first trial. 1. Admission of guilt and

■ Overview of the Case The client was accused of sexual misconduct by force in the course of his work with an employee who worked at his business, where he patted her on the shoulder and kissed her on the cheek to encourage her hard work. The client claimed that he was only trying to encourage her and did not intend to molest her, and came to Ongang Law Firm to defend himself. ■ Case Issues The main issues in this case were whether the client's behavior constituted groping by force in the workplace and the credibility of the victim's statement. ■ Ongkang's Assistance Ongkang's defense team focused on careful legal review and fact-finding from the beginning of the case. 1. Denial of the charges and active defense Mr. Onkang denied all the charges and actively defended his client's innocence. Among the list of evidence submitted, he clearly stated his disagreement with the victim's statement and investigation report, and conducted a thorough cross-examination of the victim.

The client was giving directions to the victim in a building and engaged in a conversation with the victim, resulting in a light hug. The victim was a minor at the time, but the client was unaware of this, and the victim did not disclose her age to the client. After the incident, the client realized that his behavior could be misunderstood and was deeply remorseful and came to Ongang Law Firm. ■ Case issues The issues were the client's failure to recognize that the victim was a minor, the settlement with the victim, and the victim's unwillingness to be punished. Our lawyers took on the client's case and defended the client's innocence through a thorough fact-finding process. First, we secured CCTV footage and DNA test results from the incident to prove that the client did not molest the victim, and presented evidence that contradicted the victim's statements. In particular, we provided evidence from the scene to prove that it was impossible for the client to have acted at the location claimed by the victim.

■ Case Overview The client was accused of engaging in prostitution by participating in several group prostitution meetings, during which he saw recruitment posters that stated the age of the victims as adults, and the victims acted in a manner that made them appear to be adults. The client came to Ongang for legal representation, arguing that it was difficult to recognize the possibility that the victims were minors under these circumstances. ■ Case Issues The main issues were the circumstantial factors that led the client to perceive the victims as adults, and the victims' appearance and behavior. ■ Ongkang's assistance 1. Emphasizing the client's lack of awareness: Ongkang's lawyers emphasized that the recruitment poster stated the age of the victims as adults, and that the victims looked and acted like adults. It was fully explained in court that it was difficult for the client to recognize the possibility that the victims were minors. 2. Client's remorse and willingness to improve: Mr. Ongang argued that the client was remorseful and willing to improve after the incident.

[Case Story] In this case, the client was accused of sexually abusing and psychologically controlling the victim for years, living with her in a relative's home since elementary school. The client was sentenced to 15 years in prison at the first trial for six sex offenses, including violation of the Sexual Offenses Punishment Special Law (rape of a minor under 13 years old). However, the client believed that he was falsely accused and came to us with an appeal, desperate to find out the truth. [The key point in the case] The key point in this case is when the crime was committed and the legal status of the client, whether he was a juvenile or not. After thoroughly reviewing the victim's statements and related materials, there were inconsistencies and questionable credibility, so clarifying when the incident occurred was key to determining whether the client was liable. [How Ongkang Helped] Ongkang lawyers made sure that the client was not wrongfully accused.

[The client thought she had met a man through an application and started a relationship with him, but she realized that he had been sleeping with another girlfriend. The client sent a social media message to the other woman, who was also a woman, to inform her of the incident. The other woman responded with abusive language and told the client not to contact her, and she tried to call her several times afterward. The client was embarrassed and frightened by the other woman's attitude and avoided her calls and asked her not to contact her. Suddenly, the other woman changed her attitude and said, "I'm too scared, don't contact me." The other woman then edited some of the messages that the client had sent to her and charged her with violating the Stalking Penalties Act. The client was stunned to learn that she had been the one who had been abusive and repeatedly tried to contact her. She was charged after facing the investigation alone, and despite being represented by counsel at the first trial.

In this case, our client was facing serious charges of "indecent assault" and was in danger of losing everything. He had been running his golf driving range for years and had never been in trouble, but suddenly found himself on trial at the behest of the accuser. "Her allegations are completely untrue," he insisted, "and I'm not the kind of person who would ever do anything like that." The client was frustrated and angry, but the trial was already more than halfway through, and as the investigation centered on the accuser's allegations, the situation became increasingly pessimistic. The CCTV footage from the training center, which was the only clue to prove his innocence, had long since been deleted. The client decided to switch lawyers and made the final decision to go through with the last round of closing arguments after hearing comments like "no chance of winning" and "better to settle and be done with it."