The client is a friend of the accomplice, who invested in Victim A's business and did not receive his investment back. The accomplice decided to take and dispose of Victim A's property to recover his investment, and went to the victim's office with the client. The client and his accomplice beat victims B and C, who were guarding the office, with weapons, found victim A, forced him to sign a disposition document after the assault, and detained him to prevent him from escaping. The client was later arrested by the police, who responded to a report from another person, and was investigated and tried on charges of robbery, special injury, violation of the Violent Crimes Act (joint injury), and violation of the Violent Crimes Act (joint detention). ■ Case Issues The client committed the crimes accidentally at the request of an accomplice, but faced serious charges for wielding a weapon, causing multiple victims, and detaining the victims to prevent them from reporting. Because this was a violent crime with a statutory minimum sentence of 7 years in prison and a maximum of 10 years in prison, a plea bargain could have resulted in a maximum of

In response to the victim's request for money, the client, together with the appellants, lent the victim tens of millions of won, but the full amount of the loan was not returned on the promised date. In order to get the money back, the client conspired with the appellants to lock the victim in his house, robbed him of his car and money, and assaulted him several times with dangerous objects while demanding the return of the money. As a result, a criminal case was filed by the victim, and the client was tried for special robbery and special confinement. ■ Case Issues Specialized robbery has a statutory lower limit of five years in prison, so in this case, the client and the appellant severely assaulted the victim with a dangerous object, which would have resulted in a minimum sentence of five years in prison if not reduced. However, there were sufficient mitigating circumstances, such as the fact that the victim had committed fraud against the client, which was one of the reasons for the client to assault the victim, and the client's care for the victim after the assault, such as taking care of the victim.