■ Case Overview The client recorded conversations to prove his partner's violence and intimidation during a domestic dispute. The client was charged with violating the Communications Secrecy Act because the recording inadvertently included a portion of a conversation with a third party. The client was a first-time offender and emphasized that the purpose of the recording was for his defense. Case Issues The key issues were whether the client's inclusion of a conversation with a third party in the recording process was intentional in violating the Communications Secrets Act and the legitimacy of the purpose of the recording. ■ Ong Kang's Assistance 1. Legal Basis and Lack of Intentionality The defense emphasized that the client's purpose of recording was to defend against violence and intimidation, and that the inclusion of a conversation with a third party was an unintended consequence. In particular, the fact that the beginning of the recording file consisted of a conversation between the client and the other party showed that the intentionality of the violation of the Communications Secrets Protection Act was not

■ Case Overview After suffering from infertility for a long time and trying various methods, the client couple decided to have a child through surrogacy. However, the surrogacy contract and birth-related procedures led to legal problems, and they were investigated for violating the Child Welfare Act. The client couple had been loving and raising their child, but due to their lack of knowledge of the legal process, they were accused of a crime, and they came to Ongang Law Firm for legal assistance out of frustration and fear. ■ Case Issues The core of the case was to prove that the surrogacy contract and delivery process did not meet legal standards and could be interpreted as child trafficking, but that the couple's actions were not motivated by financial gain, but by their desperate need for a child. Ongkang's assistance Ongkang Law Firm closely consulted with the client couple from the beginning of the case to ensure that their actions were motivated by their desire to have a child.

■ Case Overview During a face-to-face meeting with the other party in a situation of suspected spousal infidelity, the client became emotional and made insulting remarks to the other party. The other party intentionally drew attention to the client's remarks and amplified them, and later filed a lawsuit against him for insulting him. The client came to Ongang Law Firm to seek legal assistance, claiming that he was wronged by the incident. ■ Case Issues At the heart of the case was whether the client's remarks were the result of a temporary outburst of emotion, or whether they were intentional and intended to defame. Our assistance: From the outset of the case, ONGANG closely consulted with the client to clearly understand the entire case. Securing and analyzing evidence: We thoroughly reviewed the transcripts of the conversation, CCTV footage, and the credibility of the accuser's statements to prove that the client's remarks were merely emotional expressions. Constructing legal logic: The Supreme Court

■ Case Overview The client was emotionally disturbed after a breakup with the victim, who was a romantic partner, and engaged in some inappropriate contact and behavior. The victim reported it to the police as stalking, and the case was sent to the prosecutor's office. The client is a first-time offender, and since the incident, he has made an amicable settlement with the victim and has been undergoing psychological counseling to prevent recurrence. Under these circumstances, the client came to WONKANG for legal assistance to resolve the case amicably. Case Issues The main issue in the case was whether the client's behavior was an accidental act due to emotional agitation, or whether it could be seen as a continuous and intentional stalking behavior. ■ Onkang's Assistance 1. Establishing the facts and defense strategy Through an interview with the client, Mr. Onkang thoroughly understood the circumstances surrounding the case and emphasized that the client's actions were accidental and that it was a first-time offense. 2 Settlement with the victim

■ 사건 개요 의뢰인은 술에 취한 상태에서 공공장소에서 소란을 피우고, 특정 매장에서 물건을 절취하며, 일부 재물을 손괴한 혐의를 받았습니다. 또한, 대형마트 내에서 가위를 소지한 채 위협적인 행동을 하여 업무를 방해했다는 혐의로 조사를 받게 되었습니다. 의뢰인은 사건 당시의 상황을 깊이 반성하며 재발 방지를 다짐하였고, 억울함을 해소하기 위해 온강을 찾아주셨습니다.   ■ 사건 쟁점 의뢰인의 행위가 술에 취한 상태에서 발생한 우발적 행동이라는 점과, 피해자들과의 원만한 합의 및 처벌불원 의사가 사건 처분에 얼마나 영향을 미칠 수 있는지가 주요 쟁점이었습니다.   ■ 온강의 조력   1. 사실관계의 정리 및 법리적 검토 법무법인 온강 변호인단은 사건 당시의 상황을 철저히 분석하고, 의뢰인의 행위가 고의적이거나 계획적이지 않았음을 입증하였습니다. 특히, 술에 취한 상태에서 발생한 우발적 행동이라는 점을 강조하며,

■ 사건의 개요 의뢰인은 술을 마시고 충동적으로 평소 마음에 두고 있었던 피해자의 주거지에 방문하였으나, 피해자가 만남을 거절하자 현관문 도어락을 손괴하는 행동을 하였습니다. 이후 의뢰인은 자신의 잘못을 즉시 깨닫고 피해자와 원만한 합의를 이루기 위해 노력하였으며, 피해자의 용서를 얻고 사건을 원만히 해결하고자 법무법인 온강을 찾아주셨습니다.   ■ 사건 쟁점 본 사건은 의뢰인의 우발적이고 감정적인 행동으로 발생했으나, 피해자와의 합의와 진심 어린 반성이 주요 쟁점이었습니다.   ■ 온강의 조력 법무법인 온강 변호인단은 사건 초기부터 의뢰인의 진심 어린 반성과 피해 회복을 강조하며 사건 해결에 적극적으로 임하였습니다. 1. 피해자와의 원만한 합의: 피해자와의 소통을 통해 의뢰인의 진심 어린 사과와 재발 방지 의지를 전달하였고, 피해자가 처벌을 원하지 않는다는 합의서를 확보하였습니다. 2. 적극적인 자료 준비: 의뢰인의 반성문, 가족 및

■ 사건 개요 본 사건은 직장 내 동료 관계였던 의뢰인과 피해자 사이에서 발생한 사안입니다. 의뢰인은 업무상 친밀한 관계를 유지하던 중 피해자와의 소통 과정에서 일부 부적절한 행위가 있었고, 이는 결과적으로 스토킹 혐의로 이어졌습니다. 또한 과정에서 피해자를 강요하고 감금했다는 추가 혐의도 받게 되었습니다. 의뢰인은 본인의 행위가 스토킹이나 강요에 해당하지 않는다고 생각했으나, 법적 대응의 필요성을 인지하고 법무법인 온강을 찾아주셨습니다.   ■ 사건 쟁점 본 사건의 주요 쟁점은 의뢰인의 행위가 스토킹범죄의처벌등에관한법률상 ‘지속적이고 반복적인 스토킹 행위’에 해당하는지 여부였습니다. 특히 피해자와의 관계가 일방적인 스토킹이 아닌 상호 연락과 만남이 있었던 점, 그리고 강요 및 감금 혐의와 관련하여 피해자의 자발적 의사가 개입되었던 정황들을 어떻게 입증할 것인지가 중요했습니다.   ■ 온강의 조력 법무법인 온강 변호인단은 먼저 의뢰인과 피해자의 관계를

■ 사건 개요 본 사건은 의뢰인이 과거 같은 직장에서 근무했던 피해자에게 연락을 시도한 사안입니다. 의뢰인은 순간적인 판단 착오로 피해자의 의사에 반하여 반복적으로 연락을 취하게 되었고, 이는 결과적으로 스토킹 행위로 이어졌습니다. 피해자는 정신적 고통을 호소하며 법적 대응을 결심하였고, 이에 법무법인 온강을 찾아주셨습니다.   ■ 사건 쟁점 본 사건의 주요 쟁점은 의뢰인의 행위가 스토킹범죄의처벌등에관한법률상 구성요건에 해당하는지 여부와 의뢰인의 진정한 반성 및 재범 방지 가능성이었습니다. 특히 의뢰인이 피해자를 스토킹할 의도 없이 단순히 과거의 오해를 풀고자 하는 마음에서 행한 행위였다는 점과, 초범이며 깊은 반성의 태도를 보이고 있다는 점이 중요한 쟁점이었습니다.   ■ 온강의 조력 법무법인 온강 변호인단은 사건 초기부터 의뢰인의 진정성 있는 반성을 이끌어내는데 주력했습니다. 특히 형사조정 절차를 통해 피해자와의 원만한 합의를 위해 노력했으며, 의뢰인의

The client is a teacher at a daycare center, and has been abusive to the victim's mental health and development by slapping the victim's back with the palm of her hand because the victim was not eating well, then slapping the victim's back further when the victim was crying, and slapping the victim's face when the victim continued to cry, and the director of the daycare center and the victim's parents recognized these facts and reported the incident. ■ Case Issues There were parts of the CCTV that were exaggerated, and if the client did not intentionally hit the child in the CCTV footage, he had to explain the circumstances before and after the scene in question and state that it was not abuse, and quickly reach a settlement with the parents of the victim child to obtain a non-prosecution and prevent administrative penalties (employment restrictions for children's facilities). Ongang Law Firm's defense attorneys argued that the client was a first-time offender and that he had lost his temper while disciplining the child, which led to the crime.