24/7 support on weekends and holidays

24/7 support on weekends and holidays

24/7 support on weekends and holidays

Charged with possession of stolen property for forgetting and keeping a cell phone taken from a bus

The client kept the cell phone that the victim had left behind on the bus and kept it to help find the victim, including calling the police, but due to his busy life, he forgot that he had kept the cell phone and left it unattended, and was reported by the victim for theft of possession. The client complained that it was unfair for him to be criminally punished because he had no intention of taking the cell phone, and he was worried about being sued by the victim. Therefore, in this case, it was important for the client to prove that he had no or weak intention of illegal gain, and furthermore, to settle the case amicably with the victim to avoid future civil litigation. After checking the investigation, our lawyers promptly submitted an opinion letter to the police stating that there was no or very weak intent to illegally benefit, and proactively applied for criminal mediation to the prosecutor's office and completed an amicable settlement with the victim during the criminal mediation process. As a result, our client was able to obtain a deferred prosecution and avoid any future civil litigation.

Allegations of military sexual misconduct due to accidental physical contact with a fellow soldier while serving in the military.

■ Case summary The client was investigated for military sexual misconduct stemming from physical contact with fellow soldiers during his military service. The incident occurred in a casual situation with colleagues, and the client was deeply remorseful for his actions and reached an amicable settlement with the victims. After the incident, the client completed sexual crime prevention education to prevent recurrence, reflected on his mistakes, and cooperated with the investigation in good faith. Due to these circumstances, the client came to us for legal assistance. ■ Case Issues The main issue was to prove that the client's behavior was not intentional or a habitual offense, and that he was a first-time offender with a low risk of recidivism. ■ Ongang's assistance Our lawyers carefully analyzed the client's situation and the nature of the case, and provided the following assistance: 1. Reaching an amicable settlement with the victims - We actively coordinated to reach an amicable settlement with the victims, and the client's sincere apology and compensation for the damages

Allegations of military sexual misconduct that occurred within a unit during military service

Allegations of military sexual misconduct that occurred within a unit during military service

The client, an active duty soldier, was investigated for alleged sexual misconduct that occurred within his unit. Due to the complexity of his relationship with the victim and the circumstances of the case, as well as the unique nature of the incident occurring in the military environment, the client and his family sought professional legal assistance. ■ Case Issues The main issues in this case were: first, the nature of the rape case in the special environment of the military and how to handle it legally; second, the young age and future prospects of the accused, who was a first-time offender; third, the possibility of a settlement to repair the damage and its sincerity; fourth, the demonstration of concrete efforts to prevent recidivism; and fifth, the appropriateness of the disposition considering the status of the accused in the military. ■ Ongang Law Firm

Alleged assault during an altercation in a military housing unit

Alleged assault during an altercation in a military housing unit

A client who is in the military was cleaning and moving out of his living quarters. While cleaning, he bumped into the victim's shoulder, and the victim started a dispute with him. As a peer counselor, he had heard about the victim's difficulties in the military due to his unfaithfulness. When he confronted the victim about this, the victim began punching him. The client was charged with assault. The client tried to avoid the victim's assault, but the victim was concerned that he would be the only one punished for the assault, and he claimed that the client had also assaulted him. Under the circumstances of the incident, the client and the victim were the only people in the room, no one else witnessed the confrontation, and the victim had a bruise on his cheek.

Suspicion of escape injury due to loss of consciousness, accident aftermath, and violation of the Traffic Accident Handling Special Act (lethal injury)

■ Case Summary The client (a driver) crossed the center line while driving and caused an initial collision with a disabled taxi driver who was traveling in the opposite lane. The first accident resulted in injuries to the victim that required medical treatment for about two weeks and vehicle repair costs. The second accident occurred on a nearby road with a passenger vehicle waiting at a traffic light, which resulted in injuries to the victim that required medical treatment and vehicle repair costs. At the time, the client was unconscious due to side effects of his medication and autonomic dysfunction, which made it impossible for him to drive normally. After the accident, the client was accused of violating the Specified Crimes and Aggravated Penalties Act (escape from the scene) for leaving the scene. Case Issues The key issues in this case are whether the client lost consciousness and the absence of intent to flee. The client admits to the objective facts of the first and second traffic accidents, but denies that he lost consciousness due to autonomic dysfunction at the time of the accident.

Alleged violation of the Controlled Substances Act for repeatedly taking propofol to relieve stress

■ Case Overview The client was repeatedly prescribed propofol by a medical institution to relieve stress and depression. In the process, it was discovered that the client had been overprescribed and administered propofol without any real medical purpose, which led to an investigation for violation of the Controlled Substances Act. The client was deeply remorseful of his wrongdoing and vowed to prevent it from happening again. Case Issues The key issue in the case was to prove that the client's act of taking propofol was not out of curiosity or misuse, but was intended to relieve mental stress, and that he was unlikely to reoffend. The defense emphasized that the client had never been punished for the same offense and that this was a first-time offense. The defense also emphasized how the client came into contact with propofol and the mental and psychological situation at the time, and that the client's behavior was not a simple act of addiction.

사업 스트레스와 유혹으로 인한 수회에 걸친 엑스터시 매수 및 투약

■ 사건의 개요 의뢰인은 사업가로, 도매업체를 운영하며 안정적인 삶을 살아왔습니다. 그러나 사업 스트레스와 주변인의 유혹으로 인해 우발적으로 향정신성 의약품을 투약하게 되었습니다. 이는 단발성 사건이 아닌 수회에 걸쳐 발생하였으며, 마약류 관리에 관한 법률 위반으로 수사기관의 조사를 받게 되었습니다. 의뢰인은 자신의 잘못을 깊이 반성하고 재범하지 않겠다는 강한 의지를 가지고 법무법인 온강을 찾아주셨습니다.   ■ 사건 쟁점 본 사건의 주요 쟁점은 의뢰인의 범행 동기, 재범 가능성, 그리고 사회적 위험성이었습니다. 특히 마약류 사범에 대한 사회적 인식이 매우 부정적인 상황에서, 의뢰인의 진정성 있는 반성과 재활 의지를 어떻게 효과적으로 전달할 것인지가 중요한 과제였습니다. 또한 초범임에도 불구하고 수회의 걸친 범행이라는 점에서 처벌의 수위를 낮추는 것이 관건이었습니다.   ■ 온강의 조력 법무법인 온강 변호인단은 의뢰인의 상황을 면밀히 파악하고

우울증 및 대인기피증으로 인한 텔레그램 케타민 수회 구매 마약류관리법 위반 혐의

■ 사건의 개요 의뢰인은 우울증과 대인기피증으로 힘든 시기를 보내던 중, 지인으로부터 마약이 도움이 될 수 있다는 이야기를 듣고 텔레그램 마약류 판매 채널을 통해 케타민을 구매하게 되었습니다. 의뢰인은 수 회에 걸쳐 케타민을 구매했으며, 이후 수사가 개시되어 어려움을 겪던 중 법무법인 온강을 찾아주셨습니다.   ■ 사건 쟁점 의뢰인의 자발적 범행 인정과 진정한 반성의 입증 우울증과 대인기피증이 범행 동기에 미친 영향 분석 재범 방지를 위한 구체적 계획 수립 기존 기소유예 처분과의 관계 검토   ■ 온강의 조력 법무법인 온강 변호인단은 의뢰인의 정신건강 문제가 범행의 주된 원인이었음을 부각시키고, 현재 진행 중인 치료 상황과 향후 치료 계획을 구체적으로 제시했습니다. 특히 정부가 새롭게 시행하는 ‘사법-치료-재활 연계모델’ 프로그램 참여 의지를 강조하며, 의뢰인의 재범 방지 의지를 효과적으로 전달했습니다.

기소유예 처분 후 텔레그램을 통한 합성대마 수차례 투약 마약류관리법 위반 혐의

■ 사건의 개요 의뢰인은 수차례에 걸쳐 텔레그램을 통해 합성대마를 구매하여 투약한 혐의로 수사를 받게 되었습니다. 특히 본 건은 기소유예 처분을 받은 이후 재차 범행이 발생했다는 점에서 엄중한 처벌이 예상되는 상황이었습니다. 이에 의뢰인은 자신의 잘못을 깊이 뉘우치고 재범 방지를 위한 전문적인 법률 조력을 받고자 법무법인 온강을 찾아주셨습니다.   ■ 사건 쟁점 본 사건의 핵심 쟁점은 기소유예 이후 재범이라는 불리한 정황에도 불구하고, 의뢰인의 진정성 있는 반성과 재활 의지를 입증하여 다시 한 번 기회를 얻을 수 있는가였습니다. 특히 의뢰인의 자발적 자수와 수사 협조, 적극적인 치료 참여 등을 효과적으로 입증하는 것이 중요했습니다.   ■ 온강의 조력 법무법인 온강 변호인은 의뢰인의 재범 방지를 위한 종합적인 대응 전략을 수립했습니다. 우선 상세한 반성문 작성을 지도하고, 구체적인 단약

우발적 1회 필로폰 투약 마약류관리법 위반 혐의

■ 사건의 개요 의뢰인은 우발적으로 필로폰을 투약한 혐의로 수사를 받게 되었습니다. 의뢰인의 가족이 신고한 사안으로, 초기에는 상습 투약 여부 등에 대한 의심이 있었으나, 당 법인의 체계적인 변론을 통해 1회성 투약임이 입증되었습니다. 특히 의뢰인은 장애인 가족을 부양하는 가장으로서, 가족들의 생계와 직결되는 중대한 사안이었습니다.  ■ 사건 쟁점 본 사건의 주요 쟁점은 크게 세 가지였습니다. 첫째, 투약의 상습성 여부, 둘째, 의뢰인의 재범 위험성 판단, 셋째, 사회적 유대관계 및 가정환경에 따른 교육이수조건부 기소유예 처분의 적절성이었습니다. 특히 마약류 사범에 대한 검찰의 엄정 대응 기조 속에서, 교육이수조건부 기소유예 처분을 이끌어내기 위해서는 치밀한 법리 검토와 정상참작 사유의 체계적인 입증이 필요했습니다.   ■ 온강의 조력  1. 과학적 증거 분석을 통한 1회성 투약 입증 2. 재범 방지를 위한 구체적