■ Overview of the Case (Facts) In a criminal case involving a celebrity, our client was accused of false imprisonment and defamation for his involvement in the criminal prosecution of the other party. Although the client only provided simple legal assistance to the complainant in a series of processes, including legal counseling, drafting a complaint, and reporting to the media, the other party alleged that the client intentionally disseminated falsehoods and induced the commission of a crime, resulting in severe criminal liability. The client came to WONKANG with a sense of injustice amidst the tangled statements of the parties involved, extensive conversations, recordings, and media reports. Case Issues (Features of the Case) The core issue was that the other party claimed that the client had intentionally induced innocent resolve and defamation, even though the client only provided simple legal counseling and fact-finding assistance. ■ Onkang's Assistance 1. Analyzing the Core Evidence and Legal Issues of the Case From the beginning of the investigation, Onkang's defense attorneys analyzed the case's vast amount of KakaoTalk, transcripts, medical records, and media articles.

The client was accused of the crime of stalking by the other party with whom he had a past relationship. The other party claimed that the client had caused him anxiety and fear by constantly contacting and approaching him, and sought punishment. The client argued that his behavior could not be considered stalking and that the other party's allegations were untrue. The client, who had suffered a great deal of emotional distress due to the sudden accusation, came to Wen Gang to clarify his situation and seek legal assistance. ■ Case Issues The key issues in this case were whether the client's behavior met the requirements of "stalking behavior" and "persistent or repetitive" under the Stalking Crimes and Punishment Act, and whether there was sufficient objective evidence to support the accusation other than the victim's claim. Onkang's defense team focused on the following efforts to alleviate the client's frustration and clear her name. 1. Careful legal review of the facts of the complaint

■ Case Summary The client went to the home of a romantic partner and was confronted with an unexpected situation. A third person present at the scene accused the client of special intimidation, alleging that the client had threatened him and damaged his property. The client, who felt wronged by the sudden accusation and needed legal assistance, came to WONKANG. ■ Case Issues The key issue in this case was whether the client's behavior met the elements of the crime of special intimidation, and in particular, to what extent the credibility of the victim's statement could be weighed against other evidence. Onkang Law Firm's defense team actively responded to the case from the outset to resolve the client's injustice. 1. Closely grasping and calling the facts At the time of the incident, the client was angry with the other party and did not have any ill will toward the victim.

■ Overview of the case The client was accused of being a victim of a sexual offense, but was instead accused of making a false report. The client was a minor at the time, and her relationship with the alleged perpetrator and the credibility of her account of how the incident occurred were in dispute. The client was deeply distressed by the sudden accusation of innocence, and was in need of legal assistance to clarify her accusations. ■ Case Issues The key issue in this case was whether the client's reported sexual offense victimization was false, contrary to the objective truth, and whether the client had made an affirmative showing of "falsity," which is a requirement for establishing innocence. ■ Onkang Law Firm's Assistance In order to alleviate the client's injustice, Onkang Law Firm's defense team immediately analyzed the case closely and focused on the following assistance. 1. Submission of defense briefs to actively argue the legal theory of innocence

■ Overview of the case (facts) After finalizing a collaborative divorce with her ex-spouse (the complainant), the client sued her ex-spouse for molestation, rape, and defamation (spreading falsehoods) due to problems she experienced during their marriage and during the divorce process. The client believed that she had a legitimate legal claim based on an unjustified and painful experience. However, after an investigation, the prosecutor declined to prosecute each of the charges against him, citing insufficient evidence. In response, his ex-spouse sued him for "false imprisonment," alleging that he had made up non-existent facts for the purpose of getting him criminally prosecuted. The client, who claimed sexual offenses and defamation damages but was instead falsely accused, was in extreme mental distress and legal anxiety, and sought the help of Ongang Law Firm to overcome this crisis. ■ Case Issues (Case Features) The core issue in this case was whether the client was able to prove that her ex-spouse was a