■ Overview of the case (facts) The client was accused of rape after having sex in a hotel with a minor he knew through social media. The victim claimed that the sex was forced by assault and threats, but the client consistently claimed that the sex was consensual. There were suspicious circumstances such as the victim withdrawing the report on the spot after calling 112 on the day of the incident, and the victim's father continued to contact the client for monetary compensation. The client came to Ongang Law Firm to clear his name. Case Issues (Characteristics of the Case) This was an accusation case that relied solely on the victim's unilateral statement, and the key issue was to establish the credibility of the victim's statement and the truth of the case in the absence of objective evidence. Onkang Law Firm's defense team first uncovered the truth of the case through systematic evidence collection and analysis. By closely analyzing the social media conversation history, they found that the victim initiated the contact and continuously requested to meet.

■ Overview of the Case (Facts) The client had a consensual intimate relationship with the complainant, who was an employee of the school he operated, but was accused of sexual misconduct due to a misunderstanding that occurred during his departure. The complainant believed a false rumor that the client was planning to fire her and felt betrayed, which led her to perceive the consensual relationship as coercive, which led her to report it as rape. The client came to Ongang Law Firm to clear her name and return to her normal life. Case Issues (Case Features) The client was accused of rape due to a misunderstanding, even though it was a consensual intimate relationship, and the key issue was to find out the truth and resolve the case through an amicable settlement with the accuser. Our team conducted systematic and strategic defense activities to resolve the client's grievances. First, we accurately identified the nature of the case and proved that the relationship between the client and the accuser was a mutually consensual intimate relationship.

의뢰인은 피해자를 준 강간하고 및 힘으로 제압하여 강간, 강제추행을 했다는 사실로 신고되어 법무법인 온강을 찾아주셨습니다.    ■ 사건 쟁점 의뢰인과 피해자는 오랜기간 알고 지내온 사이이며 피해자가 남자친구에게 해당 사실을 들키게 되자 합의 하에 이루어진 일임에도 의뢰인이 강제로 추행을 하고 준강간, 강간의 행위를 했다며 신고를 하게 된 사안으로 의뢰인이 무고하다는 점을 밝혀야 했습니다.   ■ 쟁점해결 법무법인 온강 변호인단은, 피해자가 원했다면 얼마든지 의뢰인의 접촉을 방지할 수 있었음에도 그러하지 않은 점, 사건이 일어난 장소의 구조 상 강제적인 성행위가 이루어질 수 없는 점 등을 주장하며 피해자의 진술만으로는 의뢰인이 피해자를 준강간, 강간, 강제추행 하였다고 인정할 수 없다는 사실을 변호인 의견서를 통해 강력하게 주장하였습니다. 이에 경찰에서는 법무법인 온강의 의견을 적극 받아들여 의뢰인이 피해자를 준강간, 강간, 강제추행을 했다는 증거가 부족하다는 이유로 불송치(혐의없음) 결정을 하였습니다.