Summary of the Case (Facts) The client had been in a relationship with his lover, which was mentally and physically challenging, and the breakup caused him to feel extreme feelings of loss and betrayal. Unable to overcome his momentary emotions, the client accidentally committed an irreparable wrong and was eventually brought to trial for serious crimes, including special crimes, and faced imprisonment. Our client, who had lived his life with integrity, came to us in a desperate situation where his life could be destroyed in an instant. Case Issues (Features of the Case) This was a case where the client was facing a very high risk of imprisonment due to the high risk of the crime itself and the competing crimes of special intimidation and special residential invasion. Therefore, it was important to convincingly present the mitigating circumstances that led to the crime to the trial court, prove that the client had deep remorse and was not at risk of reoffending, and obtain the most lenient punishment, a suspended sentence.

The client was involved in a physical conflict with several family members during an unexpected argument that occurred during a family funeral, and was charged with assault. At the time, the client was traveling for a long time and was under extreme emotional stress, and felt that there was something unjust about how the incident occurred. The client sought legal assistance in this complex situation. Case Issues (Features of the Case) As the case arose from a special relationship between family members, it was important to impeach the credibility of the victims' statements and reveal the actual truth of the case through objective evidence such as CCTV. The key issue was to avoid or minimize criminal penalties by actively arguing whether the client's actions constituted assault or whether there was a reason to carve out a legal defense such as self-defense. ■ Onkang's defense team was able to work with the client and

■ 사건 개요 의뢰인은 술에 취한 상태로 한 라이브카페에 입장하여 영업 종료 후에도 퇴거 요청에 불응하였고, 이에 피해 업주가 112에 신고하였습니다. 현장에 출동한 경찰관들이 상황을 정리하려 하였으나, 의뢰인은 실랑이 과정에서 경찰관들의 가슴을 손으로 밀치는 등의 행동을 하여 공무집행을 방해한 혐의를 받았습니다. 사건 이후 의뢰인은 깊이 반성하며 선처를 구하기 위해 법무법인 온강을 찾아주셨습니다.   ■ 사건 쟁점 의뢰인의 행위가 고의적이고 악의적인 공무집행방해로 볼 수 있는지 여부와 사건 당시의 음주 상태가 정상참작 사유로 인정될 수 있는지가 주요 쟁점이었습니다.   ■ 온강의 조력 법무법인 온강 변호인단은 사건 초기부터 의뢰인의 억울함을 해소하기 위해 철저한 사실관계 분석과 법리적 대응에 집중하였습니다. 먼저, 사건 당시의 CCTV와 증거기록을 면밀히 검토하여 의뢰인의 행위가 고의적이거나 악의적인 공무집행방해가 아니라 만취 상태에서

■ Case Summary The client attempted to contact the victim on numerous occasions due to the emotional turmoil that arose during a breakup with his ex-lover. In the process of attempting to communicate with the victim to settle the relationship and resolve past financial issues, the client continued to contact the victim in various ways, including text messages and phone calls, which ultimately led to the crime of stalking. In particular, the client was a conscientious employee with no criminal record and was in danger of criminal penalties. ■ Case Issues The main issues in this case were threefold: first, whether there was a clear error regarding the residence listed in the indictment; second, whether there was a mistake in the facts of the act of making a telephone call listed in the Appendix Crime Schedule(2); and third, whether there was a possibility of settlement with the victim and the necessity of criminal punishment. In particular, in relation to the act of making a telephone call, the interpretation of the law based on Supreme Court precedents and lower court decisions became an important issue. ■

■ 사건 개요 본 사건은 서울 소재 아파트 정문 앞에서 발생한 우발적 폭행 사건입니다. 당사자들 간의 민사적 분쟁이 있던 상황에서, 의뢰인이 상대방을 일으키려 한 과정에서 신체접촉이 발생하여 폭행 혐의로 기소된 사안입니다. 의뢰인은 상황의 부당함을 호소하며 법무법인 온강을 찾아주셨습니다.   ■ 사건 쟁점 본 사건의 주요 쟁점은 크게 두 가지였습니다. 의뢰인의 행위가 폭행죄의 구성요건인 ‘고의성’을 충족하는지 여부 설사 폭행의 고의성이 인정된다 하더라도 해당 행위가 형법 제20조의 ‘정당행위’에 해당하는지 여부   ■ 온강의 조력 저희 법무법인 온강 변호인단은 본 사건에서 다음과 같은 전략적 변론으로 의뢰인을 조력하였습니다.   CCTV 영상 증거에 대한 면밀한 분석을 통해 의뢰인의 행위가 상대방을 일으키기 위한 불가피한 신체 접촉이었음을 입증하였습니다. 대법원 판례(2021도9680 판결 등)를 적극 활용하여 사회상규에 위배되지 않는