■ Overview of the case The client was accused of assault and rape by a former romantic partner. The other party claimed that the client had caused physical and mental harm to her through coercive behavior, but the prosecution decided not to prosecute. The client filed an appeal against the prosecution's decision, but the client complained that there was no assault and coercive sexual intercourse in the situation, but rather that she suffered from constant verbal and psychological pressure from the other party. To resolve the injustice, the client came to Ongang Law Firm. ■ Case Issues The main issues in the case were the discrepancies between the other party's statements and objective evidence (KakaoTalk conversations, recordings, etc.), and whether the client's behavior was intentional and coercive. Onkang's representation: Onkang's lawyers provided thorough and systematic legal support to prove the client's innocence. Analyzing the evidence: By carefully reviewing the KakaoTalk conversations and recordings submitted by the other party, we were able to prove that the other party's

■ Case Overview Our client was accused of indecent assault based on a physical encounter that occurred during a social gathering with acquaintances. At the time of the incident, the client and the accuser were at the pool and had physical contact with each other, but it was a simple physical collision. However, the accuser took issue with the alleged sexual intent, and the client came to us to resolve the situation. Case Issues In the absence of objective evidence to prove the client's sexual intent other than the complainant's statement, CCTV footage of the incident and witness statements were key evidence in the case. Onkang's assistance 1. Thorough fact-finding and evidence gathering 2. Legal analysis and logical arguments 3. Legal responses to gender sensitivity 4. Aggressive defense at the prosecution stage ■ Outcome The prosecution found that the client's behavior had no sexual intent, and that the accuser's statement alone was not enough to prove the charge.