Our client is a physical therapist working at an oriental medicine hospital who was accused of forcibly molesting a patient during hospitalization by touching her body and was sent to the prosecutor's office. The client expressed that it did not make sense that he had molested the complainant when he had provided inpatient treatment to the complainant in the same way that he had treated many patients as a physical therapist, and the issue in this case was whether there was anything to indicate that the client had committed an act of molestation beyond the scope of inpatient treatment and whether the client had the intention to molest the complainant. After carefully analyzing the video of the entire process of the treatment provided by the client, the lawyer in charge of Onkang Law Firm advised the lead prosecutor that 'the client was carefully explaining the treatment to the complainant, and the complainant was also receiving treatment without any problems.

The client came to Ongang Law Firm because she was accused of engaging in prostitution by visiting a massage parlor, paying for a massage, and performing similar acts. ■ Case Issue The client had visited a massage parlor and received a massage, but the massage was too different from the type of massage she expected, but she was unable to protest and received the massage anyway, so she had to argue that it did not constitute prostitution because she did not visit the parlor to engage in similar behavior in the first place. The defense team of Ongang Law Firm confirmed that the client was a woman and the masseur was a man, and that they were both naked and unable to protest, and clarified the facts to avoid any other misunderstandings through investigation practice. In the defense opinion, the defense team argued that the client did not intend to engage in prostitution and did not have any suspicion that a similar act would be performed because she had seen positive reviews on the Internet, but rather that the masseur deceived the client and pretended to be a massage.

The client was in the middle of a legal dispute with the accuser after being victimized by illegal filming, and in the process, he had a dispute with the accuser and protested by sending emails, but was sued for intimidation, stalking, and defamation. ■ Case Issues The client had sent several emails to the accuser to complain about the harm she had suffered, and had told the person concerned about the illegal filming, fearing that she would become another victim of sexually transmitted diseases. The client had to argue that he was angry at being victimized and sent complaints to the complainant, but that he did not commit the crime of stalking by making threats, and that he was not guilty of defamation as claimed by the complainant. ■ Resolving the issue Ong Kang's counsel obtained and reviewed in detail the complaint filed by the complainant and the emails sent by their client to the complainant. The counsel then

The client went on a few dates with a woman he met at a social gathering, but suddenly the woman accused him of rape and wanted legal assistance. ■ Case Issue The victim demanded an apology before calling the police, and the client was forced to apologize, but the texts could be used as evidence against him. Our defense team argued that it was a permissible physical contact between the client and the victim based on how they met, their relationship, and past dating history. In addition, to convince the prosecutor, we analyzed the messages and phone calls exchanged between the parties in the past and submitted them as evidence along with a lawyer's opinion. As a result, the prosecutor accepted our opinion and decided to dismiss the case (no charges), and our client was able to return to his daily life with peace of mind.

The client came to Ongang Law Firm because he was accused of raping the victim, whom he met through a dating application, after they drank together at a hotel. The client strongly denied the allegations, stating that he and the victim, whom he had met through a dating app, drove to a lodging house and had a few drinks together, but never engaged in quasi-rape. It was important to prove that the victim's report was false. After learning the details of the case from the client, the defense team at Onkang Law Firm wrote a defense brief in which the client's innocence was emphatically asserted. The defense team also requested that the investigation be closed as it was a case of innocence. In response to Onkang's arguments, the police decided to close the investigation (no charges) and the client was able to return to his daily life with peace of mind.

The client was accused of quasi-forcible molestation by grabbing the hands of the accuser who was drunk and unable to resist while drinking at a bar with a co-worker and wrapping his arms around her waist, and of quasi-rape by taking the victim to an accommodation on the same day. The case was not an easy situation to argue for acquittal because the victim appeared to be heavily intoxicated on CCTV at the time of the incident, and there were witnesses who were consistent with the complainant's statement. Therefore, we had to enhance the credibility of the client's statement and point out the parts of the complainant's claim that were contrary to the rule of thumb or inconsistent to obtain a 'no charge' disposition. ■ Issue Resolution Law Firm Ongang's defense team found it difficult to accept that the witness would have left their client and the victim to walk home alone if the contact was more than 'mere touching' and amounted to 'quasi-forced molestation', and that the subsequent KakaoTalk conversation showed that the complainant's

The client was accused of sexual harassment by a coworker who claimed that the client touched her body parts and attempted to kiss her on the day of the incident. ■ Case Issues The client had to prove that he did not forcibly grope the victim against her will, that she did not refuse to be touched, and that the touching was done in a mutually favorable state. Our lawyers secured the CCTV footage of the incident early through a motion to preserve evidence, and through careful analysis of the CCTV footage, we confirmed that the victim was in a harmonious mood when they were together and that there was no evidence of her being forcibly groped. We also confirmed that the victim usually initiated sexual conversations with our client and that she filed the complaint at a time when she claimed to have been treated unfairly by the company. We then helped her to state the facts in detail through an investigation exercise, and through the defense opinion, we showed that the CCTV footage in the

When the client's girlfriend found out about the client and the complainant dating, the complainant claimed to have been raped by the client, but then changed her story to say that she could not remember, and did not press charges. Three years later, the complainant contacted the client out of the blue and demanded to speak to him, and when he did not respond, she accused him of rape, which led to this case. ■ Case Issues The client claimed that he and the complainant had consensual sex on good terms, but he was in a difficult situation due to a 'false' response on a polygraph test. In the end, the only evidence in the case was the complainant's statement, so the issue was whether the victim's statement was credible. ■ Resolving the issue The defense argued that the complainant did not specify a clear date of harm in her complaint, and in a subsequent statement, the complainant claimed that on the specific date of harm, she was with a friend.