The client and the complainant were co-presidents of a company, and the client breached his fiduciary duty to the complainant to legitimately operate the company together. The client gradually cut off contact with the complainant, formed a new company separately, and caused the complainant to benefit financially. professional misconduct of professional misconduct.
Case issues
A. What it takes to be guilty of professional misconduct
B. whether the client's conduct constitutes professional misconduct
C. The accuser's motive for making a false accusation
Troubleshooting issues
In this case, our lawyers first carefully reviewed the relationship between the complainant and the client, and then submitted evidence of the ongoing criminal case due to the complainant's misconduct as evidence, while also reviewing the facts of the case and arguing that the client's behavior did not constitute professional misconduct.
With the help of Ong Kang Law Firm's defense team non-remand decision, our client was able to get back to his life.
