■ Case summary The client was investigated for military sexual misconduct stemming from physical contact with fellow soldiers during his military service. The incident occurred in a casual situation with colleagues, and the client was deeply remorseful for his actions and reached an amicable settlement with the victims. After the incident, the client completed sexual crime prevention education to prevent recurrence, reflected on his mistakes, and cooperated with the investigation in good faith. Due to these circumstances, the client came to us for legal assistance. ■ Case Issues The main issue was to prove that the client's behavior was not intentional or a habitual offense, and that he was a first-time offender with a low risk of recidivism. ■ Onkang's assistance Our lawyers carefully analyzed the client's situation and the nature of the case, and provided the following assistance: 1. Reaching an amicable settlement with the victims - We actively coordinated to reach an amicable settlement with the victims, and the client's sincere apology and compensation for the damages

■ Case Overview The client was accused of assault when he pointed out the poor dress of a junior cadet at a certain military installation. The victim claimed that the client tugged on his T-shirt and made physical contact with him, which led to the client being investigated for assault. However, the client claimed that the contact was part of a legitimate local correction in accordance with military discipline. The client came to Wong Kang for legal assistance. ■ Case Issues The key issues in the case were whether the victim's statement was sufficient to establish a charge of assault, and whether an act in accordance with military discipline can be recognized as a legitimate act that does not violate social norms. ■ Onkang's Assistance 1. Clarification of Facts and Credibility of Statements Onkang's defense team thoroughly analyzed all the facts related to the situation at the time of the incident. The victim's statement was not specific and did not match the witnesses' statements.

■ Case summary This safety incident occurred during a tank training exercise in a military unit. The failure to comply with safety rules while operating the equipment resulted in an injury to a member of the unit, and the victim suffered injuries that required medical treatment for approximately six weeks. After the accident, the parties immediately acknowledged responsibility and apologized, but as the investigation progressed, they sought legal assistance. ■ Case Issues The key issues in this case were the degree of the defendant's professional negligence and whether there was joint negligence, especially since the defendant was assigned to a temporary position that was different from his original job, and whether his supervisor breached his duty of care. The defense team of Onkang Law Firm argued in the following directions: Demonstrating that the defendant's duty of care was not the same as that of a professional in the same position The superior's