The client's job was an ordering representative. The client and the victim were partners in a company and did business with the victim's company. The client ordered more than the victim needed and misappropriated a portion of the money wired to the victim in various ways. The client was tried for fraud. ■ Case Issues The client caused the company to over-order the products it needed, and then had the company's financial officer transfer the amount of the over-order to the manufacturing company, resulting in damages to the victim company amounting to 100 million units. Therefore, it was important for the client to compensate for the damages and avoid imprisonment through a plea bargain, as severe punishment was inevitable even if the amount was compensated. The defense lawyers at Ongang Law Firm argued that the amount of damages compensated by the defendant was reasonable, even though it fell short of the total amount of damages; that the defendant committed the crime due to his difficult livelihood and the degree of blame was relatively weak; that many people

The client and the complainant were co-presidents of a company, and the client was accused by the complainant of breaching his professional duty to run the company legally together. The client gradually cut off contact with the complainant, established a new company separately, and allowed the complainant to gain financial benefits. Issues in the case A. The requirements for the offense of professional dishonesty B. Whether the client's conduct constituted professional dishonesty C. The client's motive for filing the false accusation. Motivation of the accuser to file a false accusation ■ Issue Resolution In this case, our lawyers first carefully reviewed the relationship between the accuser and our client, and then submitted the fact that a criminal case was underway due to the accuser's misconduct as evidence, while also reviewing the legal facts that our client's actions did not constitute professional misconduct and actively arguing that the facts were different from the accuser's allegations. With the assistance of our lawyers, the case was dismissed and our client was able to return to his daily life.

The client stole luxury clothes, bags, and other items worth more than tens of millions of won from the defendant, who worked as a domestic helper in her home for many years. The client sued the domestic helper for theft. ■ Case Issues 1) During the prosecution, the defendant admitted only to the theft of luxury clothing and other items for which there was objective evidence such as CCTV footage, and 2) The defendant denied that there was no objective evidence regarding expensive luxury bags such as Chanel, Prada, Hermes, Gucci, etc. 3) Our firm appeared at the evidentiary hearing to provide specific opinions and to file a severe plea against the defendant. The defense team of Ongang Law Firm attended the evidence examination date and expressed their opinions by specifically identifying items of similar size and material in the CCTV footage of the defendant's residence, etc.

The client, along with his accomplices, received home appliances from the victim company in the name of free gifts. The client bought them and sold them as second-hand goods, defrauding the company of more than hundreds of millions of won. The client came to Ongang Law Firm after the investigative agency requested an arrest warrant based on the facts of the alleged violation of the Act on Aggravated Punishment of Certain Economic Crimes (fraud). ■ Case Issues The investigative agency requested an arrest warrant for our client on the grounds that the crime was serious, there was a high likelihood of future recidivism, and there was a possibility of destruction of evidence in light of the long period of time that our client had committed the crime, the sophistication of the crime, and the actions taken by the suspect to avoid detection during the crime. The investigating agency suspected that the client had committed many other crimes in addition to this one, based on the client's account transaction history. In the second application for the warrant, the investigating agency further proved the conspiracy and organization among the accomplices to detain the client,