■ Case Overview The defendant was entrusted by the client to manage the account, including the payment of capital gains taxes, and misappropriated the entrusted funds. The defendant withdrew tens of millions of won from the complainant's account in the name of paying capital gains taxes, but the actual amount of taxes paid was much less than that, and the defendant used the remaining amount for personal use. The client approached Ongang Law Firm. ■ Case Issues The key issues in this case were twofold: first, the scope and limits of the delegation of account management, and second, whether the defendants' actions constituted embezzlement. In particular, the existence of the defendants' alleged "implied authorization to use" and the actual use of the funds related to capital gains taxes became important issues. Onkang's defense team took a multifaceted approach to successfully resolve this case. First, we closely analyzed the bank's account transaction details to determine whether the

Case Summary The client was accused of using another person's identity to obtain medical care and prescription drugs while seeking psychiatric treatment. Over the course of several months, the client was found to have used another person's social security number to receive medical treatment and prescribed psychotropic medications, and to have fraudulently received insurance benefits from the National Health Insurance Service. The client was deeply troubled when the investigation began and approached Ongang Law Firm. ■ Case Issues The main issues in this case were threefold: first, the client's medical condition and the specificity of his motive for committing the crime; second, sentence adjustment in a situation where multiple crimes were contested; and third, effective guidance to prevent recidivism. In particular, due to the nature of the crime involving psychotropic drugs, the possibility of a prison sentence could not be ruled out, so a therapeutic approach was necessary. The defense team at Onkang Law Firm was able to prove that the client's motive for committing the crime was not just to gain profit.

■ Case Overview Our client was engaged in the business of constructing and leasing multifamily housing, and signed lease agreements with tenants and received deposits from them. However, due to unexpected changes in the financial environment and refusal to extend loans, the client was declared bankrupt and was sued for fraud due to the delay in returning the tenants' deposits. The client came to Ongang Law Firm complaining of injustice. Issues in the case 1. Whether there was deceitful behavior for the purpose of extorting security deposits at the time of signing the lease agreement 2. Whether the tenants' security deposits were diverted to other purposes, such as the sale of office buildings 3. Determining the sincerity of the accused's repayment capacity and intention to return the security deposits 4: 1. to prove that the defendant had sufficient repayment capacity at the time of signing the lease, the market value of the property at that time and the loan