■ Overview of the Case (Facts) Our client met a woman at a bar, developed a mutual attraction to her, and engaged in consensual sexual intercourse. However, the woman accused him of rape a few days later, claiming that the sexual intercourse was coercive and that she suffered a fractured rib in the process. Our client sought our help in resolving the accusation, as he was at risk of being branded as a sex offender. Case Issues (Case Features) This case centered on the issue of whether the sexual intercourse was forced, the credibility of the complainant's statements, and the absence of a causal relationship between the injuries she allegedly sustained and our client's actions. In particular, there were many points where the complainant's statements were inconsistent and clearly contradicted by objective evidence from the investigative agency to the courtroom, so it was important to dig into them and destroy the credibility of her statements. ■ Onkang's defense team was able to prove the key allegation of a "consensual relationship" and

Summary of the case (facts) The client lived with the victim, who was related to him since childhood, and was charged with six serious charges of committing sexual offenses against her over a period of years. Based on the victim's testimony, the trial court sentenced the client to 15 years in prison. Faced with the prospect of losing everything, our client turned to Onkang Law Firm for his last hope, and with our assistance, he was acquitted of all charges on appeal. However, the prosecutor disagreed and filed an appeal to the Supreme Court, which was the final step in a long legal battle. The credibility of the victim's testimony was a key issue in the case, as the victim's testimony was the only evidence in the case, without any objective evidence. In particular, in the Supreme Court appeal, the appellate court (2nd instance) that acquitted them misunderstood the law or misinterpreted the limits of liberal psychology.

■ Overview of the case (facts) The client was accused of using his cell phone's camera function to take a picture of a restaurant employee's body while in the restaurant. The victim filed a complaint alleging unlawful filming, and the client stated that it was a mistake due to poor judgment in the heat of the moment. As a first-time offender and facing a serious sexual offense charge, the client sought out Ongang Law Firm for an appropriate legal response and sentencing. ■ Case Issues (Features of the Case) The key issues were to provide appropriate extenuating circumstances for the illegal filming charge and to obtain a deferred prosecution through specific efforts to prevent recidivism. Ongkang Law Firm's defense team did its best to secure the client's good behavior through systematic and strategic defense activities. First, we secured an amicable settlement with the victim, which showed that the victim did not want to punish the client. This proved that the client had recovered from the damage. A detailed reflection statement to show the client's sincere remorse

■ Overview of the case (facts) The client was accused of rape after having sex in a hotel with a minor he knew through social media. The victim claimed that the sex was forced by assault and threats, but the client consistently claimed that the sex was consensual. There were suspicious circumstances such as the victim withdrawing the report on the spot after calling 112 on the day of the incident, and the victim's father continued to contact the client for monetary compensation. The client came to Ongang Law Firm to clear his name. Case Issues (Characteristics of the Case) This was an accusation case that relied solely on the victim's unilateral statement, and the key issue was to establish the credibility of the victim's statement and the truth of the case in the absence of objective evidence. Onkang Law Firm's defense team first uncovered the truth of the case through systematic evidence collection and analysis. By closely analyzing the social media conversation history, they found that the victim initiated the contact and continuously requested to meet.

■ Overview of the Case (Facts) The client had a consensual intimate relationship with the complainant, who was an employee of the school he operated, but was accused of sexual misconduct due to a misunderstanding that occurred during his departure. The complainant believed a false rumor that the client was planning to fire her and felt betrayed, which led her to perceive the consensual relationship as coercive, which led her to report it as rape. The client came to Ongang Law Firm to clear her name and return to her normal life. Case Issues (Case Features) The client was accused of rape due to a misunderstanding, even though it was a consensual intimate relationship, and the key issue was to find out the truth and resolve the case through an amicable settlement with the accuser. Our team conducted systematic and strategic defense activities to resolve the client's grievances. First, we accurately identified the nature of the case and proved that the relationship between the client and the accuser was a mutually consensual intimate relationship.

■ Outline of the case (Facts) The client was an ordinary office worker who had a hobby of shooting body profiles. Due to his psychological fascination with the male body and a momentary lapse of judgment, he made the grave mistake of photographing the victims' bodies without their consent. He came to Ongang Law Firm in a desperate crisis where he could become a sex offender and face deportation due to a single mistake. ■ Case Issues (Case Features) This case was a very serious matter that could lead to deportation, especially since the client was a foreign national, as it could be seen as a crime against multiple victims, and the possibility of imprisonment was high. Therefore, it was a key issue to achieve an amicable settlement with the victim and a fine through sincere remorse. From the outset of the case, Onkang's team of lawyers worked to achieve the most favorable outcome for the client, including the following tailored legal strategies

■ Overview of the Case (Facts) Our client was charged with rape in connection with a physical encounter he had with a woman he met by chance near a guesthouse. The trial court found the client guilty and sentenced him to imprisonment based solely on the victim's statement. The client filed an appeal, complaining of unfairness, and sought our help to correct the unfairness of the trial court's decision. Case Issues (Case Features) In this case, the client was convicted in the first trial based solely on the victim's testimony, and the key issues on appeal were impeaching the credibility of the victim's testimony and disputing the realistic possibility of the crime method described in the indictment. On Kang's Assistance Law Firm's defense team actively contested the factual errors and legal errors of the first trial court's ruling on appeal, and focused on the following assistance to resolve the client's injustice. 1. Highlighting the inconsistency and vagueness of the victim's statements: The specifics of the victim's statements to the investigative agency and during the first trial were emphasized.