■ Overview of the case The client was accused of assault and rape by a former romantic partner. The other party claimed that the client had caused physical and mental harm to her through coercive behavior, but the prosecution decided not to prosecute. The client filed an appeal against the prosecution's decision, but the client complained that there was no assault and coercive sexual intercourse in the situation, but rather that she suffered from constant verbal and psychological pressure from the other party. To resolve the injustice, the client came to Ongang Law Firm. ■ Case Issues The main issues in the case were the discrepancies between the other party's statements and objective evidence (KakaoTalk conversations, recordings, etc.), and whether the client's behavior was intentional and coercive. Onkang's representation: Onkang's lawyers provided thorough and systematic legal support to prove the client's innocence. Analyzing the evidence: By carefully reviewing the KakaoTalk conversations and recordings submitted by the other party, we were able to prove that the other party's

■ Case Summary The client was accused of sexual misconduct after he made physical contact with the victim on the subway on his way home from work. The victim alleged that the client intentionally pressed his body against her, but the client consistently maintained that the contact was accidental due to the crowded conditions on the subway. During the police investigation, CCTV footage was obtained, and the client complained of injustice and sought legal assistance. Case Issues The main issues in the case were the discrepancies between the victim's statement and the CCTV footage, and whether the client was intentional. Our Assistance Our lawyers thoroughly analyzed the facts from the beginning of the case and did their best to prove the client's innocence. 1. CCTV footage analysis: We carefully reviewed the CCTV footage of the subway at the time of the incident and obtained evidence to prove that the client did not intentionally molest the victim. In particular, the footage showed that the client was not

■ Case Overview While counseling a client to recover his investment, the client was under great psychological stress due to the client's persistent insistence and strong protests. After the counseling session ended, the client spread his arms in place to appease the client, expressing that he was "having a hard time," but this behavior was misinterpreted and he was accused of rape. The client came to Ongang Law Firm seeking legal assistance. Case Issues The key issue was whether the suspect's behavior resulted in physical contact and the victim's inability to resist, which are the elements of the crime of rape. ■ Ongkang's Assistance 1. Thorough fact-finding at the outset of the caseOngkang's defense team thoroughly reviewed the client's statements and relevant evidence, and found that the suspect's behavior did not constitute intent or initiation of rape. 2. Thorough response to legal issuesWhether physical contact is required for the crime of forcible molestation and the standard of assault or intimidation required in the crime of forcible molestation

The client was driving his car during the early morning hours when he met a foreign victim, struck up a conversation, and offered to drive her to her destination. The two parties engaged in flirting and physical contact in the car, but after the incident, the victim filed a complaint alleging that the client had molested her while she was intoxicated. The victim came to Ongang Law Firm to seek legal representation. Case Issues The victim's statements were inconsistent during the initial and subsequent investigations, and there was a lack of concrete evidence to prove the client's intent to molest her. ■ Ongkang's assistance 1. Initial response and fact-findingOngkang's lawyers interviewed the client to thoroughly understand the circumstances surrounding the case and summarized the core issues of the case based on the client's statements. In particular, the victim's claims of 'drunkenness' and 'irresistible state' were challenged.

■ Case Overview Our clients, Mr. A and Mr. B, had known the victim since elementary school and were friendly with each other at the time of the incident. However, over time, their relationship turned sour, and they were later accused of rape and assault by the victim. The incident was alleged to have occurred about two years ago, but the circumstances of the incident were not clearly established, and the accused denied the allegations outright. The accused came to Ongang Law Firm for a thorough legal response from the beginning of the case. ■ Case Issues In the absence of direct evidence other than the victim's statement, the key issue was whether the clients' behavior was a simple prank or whether there was intent to commit a crime. ■ Ongkang's assistance 1. Initial analysis and strategy formulation: Ongkang's lawyers conducted in-depth consultations with the clients from the beginning of the case to understand the whole story of the case and to determine the credibility of the victim's statement.

■ Case Overview The client had been in contact with the complainant, whom he knew through mutual acquaintances, and developed a mutual liking for each other, and at the complainant's suggestion, the client visited the complainant's home. The client and the complainant spent time together and had a casual sexual relationship, but the complainant later accused the client of rape and other charges. The client continued to insist that the sexual intercourse was mutually consensual and complained of injustice, and came to Ongang Law Firm to resolve the case. ■ Case Issues The key issues in this case were whether there was assault or intimidation at the time of the sexual intercourse, and whether the sexual intercourse was consensual. ■ Onkang's Assistance In order to support the client's claim, Onkang's defense team thoroughly analyzed the circumstances and evidence before and after the incident. First, we carefully reviewed the messages exchanged between the complainant and the client, the situation at the time of the incident, and the characteristics of the location to determine whether the sex was consensual.

■ Case Overview The client was under investigation for allegedly making inappropriate physical contact with a chauffeur while driving a car with a substitute driver after a meeting with an acquaintance while intoxicated. The client admitted his wrongdoing, sincerely apologized to the victim, and came to Wong Kang to resolve the case. ■ Case Issues The main issues in this case were whether the client's actions were accidental and while intoxicated, and whether the client could amicably settle with the victim. We emphasized that the client was a first-time offender and that his actions were accidental due to his intoxication at the time of the incident. We also thoroughly prepared the settlement agreement and related pleadings to demonstrate that the client sincerely apologized to the victim and reached an amicable settlement with the victim. We also emphasized that the client has been diligent in completing sexual assault rehabilitation education and self-improvement programs since the incident and is committed to preventing recidivism.

The client had been acquainted with the complainant through mutual acquaintances, and they met at the complainant's request. They had sexual intercourse at the client's home, but the complainant accused the client of quasi-rape after the sexual intercourse. The client continued to insist that the sexual intercourse was mutually consensual and complained of injustice, and came to Ongang Law Firm to resolve the case. ■ Case Issues The key issues in this case were whether there was assault or intimidation at the time of the sexual intercourse, and whether the sexual intercourse was consensual. To support our client's claim, our lawyers closely examined the circumstances surrounding the incident and thoroughly reviewed the credibility of the complainant's statements and evidence. In particular, we collected various evidence, including the content of KakaoTalk conversations with the complainant, recordings, and her behavior after the incident, to prove that the sex was consensual.

■ Case Overview The client first met the victim through an application, and the two became intimate over drinks and conversation. On the day of the incident, the client and the victim traveled to a hostel together and had sex, but the case began when the victim accused the client of quasi-rape. The client claimed that the sex was mutually consensual, and the victim came to us for legal assistance. Case Issues The main issues were whether the victim was in a state of mind or incapacitation at the time, and whether the client intentionally committed the crime by taking advantage of the victim's condition. ■ Onkang's Assistance 1. Thorough Analysis of Facts and Securing EvidenceLaw Firm Onkang's defense team thoroughly analyzed all the facts related to the situation at the time of the incident. In particular, due to the client's habit of recording in his daily work, the recordings obtained proved that the victim was able to communicate at the time of the incident and that the sexual intercourse was consensual.

■ Case Overview Our client was accused of indecent assault based on a physical encounter that occurred during a social gathering with acquaintances. At the time of the incident, the client and the accuser were at the pool and had physical contact with each other, but it was a simple physical collision. However, the accuser took issue with the alleged sexual intent, and the client came to us to resolve the situation. Case Issues In the absence of objective evidence to prove the client's sexual intent other than the complainant's statement, CCTV footage of the incident and witness statements were key evidence in the case. Onkang's assistance 1. Thorough fact-finding and evidence gathering 2. Legal analysis and logical arguments 3. Legal responses to gender sensitivity 4. Aggressive defense at the prosecution stage ■ Outcome The prosecution found that the client's behavior had no sexual intent, and that the accuser's statement alone was not enough to prove the charge.