Our client was the victim of the theft of thousands of dollars worth of luxury clothing, bags, and other items from the defendant, who had worked as a domestic helper in her home for many years. In response, our client filed a theft for theft.
Case issues
1) The defendant admits only to the theft of luxury clothing, etc. for which there is objective evidence, such as CCTV footage, during the prosecution.
2) The prosecution denied that there was any objective evidence regarding high-priced luxury bags such as Chanel, Prada, Hermes, Gucci, etc.
3) Accordingly, Law Firm Ongang appeared at the evidence investigation date and made specific comments and decided to make a severe plea against the defendant.
Troubleshooting issues
Ongang Law Firm's defense attorneys attended the evidence investigation date and expressed their opinions by specifically identifying items of similar size and material in the CCTV footage of the defendant's residence, and made it clear that the client had no intention of settling with the defendant and that if a criminal deposit was made, it would be a surprise deposit without the client's consent.
The defendant also made a criminal bond of 5,000 million won immediately after the decision, and Law Firm Ongang quickly expressed its intention to reject the bond by submitting a motion for recovery to the bonding system and sending a proof of content to the defendant and his counsel.
Even though the defendant is a first-time offender and has made a relatively large public offering, the trial court sentenced the defendant to court custody due to the client's severe plea. the defendantthe client's severe plea.
